User talk:Ash1eyL93

July 2015
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a change to an article, New Zealand, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that blogs are not reliable sources; as a rule, nothing at a blogspot site is usable as a source in an article. —C.Fred (talk) 23:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Auckland Town Hall. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. ''Please don't use a blog as a source just as a way to work links to it into articles. This is especially true if you're involved with the blog as a contributor or editor.'' —C.Fred (talk) 00:48, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright and conflict of interest problems
I see you add lots of links to heritageetal and under the assumption that this is your own blog, I would like to remind you of our conflict of interest guidelines. The material you add is an asset to Wikipedia, so I am not too concerned in your case. However, some of the material you are adding, for example to Eden Park, is a direct copy of sentences from the blog, and this is a breach of the blog's copyright. If you are the owner of the blog, you can rectify the situation by changing the copyright notice there to a licence compatible with Wikipedia, such as the CC BY-SA 3.0 Licence. You can find more information at WP:IOWN. Unfortunately, if you take no action then many of your edits may need to be reverted.- gadfium 00:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Auckland Town Hall. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion, so any further spamming will be regarded as vandalism. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Also, please review WP:Reliable sources. Blogs are rarely deemed as reliable sources; articles should really be sourced to other works that have more thorough editorial review processes.'' —C.Fred (talk) 22:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)