User talk:Ashaae

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dental health and hygiene (November 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dental health and hygiene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dental_health_and_hygiene Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikiisawesome&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dental_health_and_hygiene reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia  /tlk  17:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Biodiversity of india
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Biodiversity of india, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.biodiversityofindia.org/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Biodiversity of india


A tag has been placed on Biodiversity of india requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.biodiversityofindia.org/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. APK whisper in my ear  03:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mother teresa's love and service


A tag has been placed on Mother teresa's love and service, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright
Please stop posting content from other websites. All content is assumed to be automatically copyrighted unless permission is specifically granted through WP:ORTS or unless the website states that the content is fair use. However even if the content was fair use, it's still redundant to the main article for Mother Theresa and is not written in a neutral fashion and as such, would still be unusable.

I have to warn you: if you continue to post copyrighted material you run the risk of getting permanently blocked from editing. Wikipedia takes copyright seriously and continually reposting material like this is seen as extremely disruptive. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I took another look at your edit history and it shows that all you've done is cut/paste material from elsewhere. I can't really see where you honestly understand that copyright is unacceptable, despite at least one warning prior to mine that made this fairly clear. What pushed it was that after I posted the warning, you went to the article you cut/pasted into Wikipedia and posted Bible numbers. When something is up for deletion as a total copyright violation, it's not a good idea to keep editing it unless you're trying to re-write it in your own words. (However in this instance we have an article on Mother Theresa, so it's fairly unnecessary for us to have another article.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)