User talk:Ashaikh13

Hi

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!

Red  Hot Sheena |talk 09:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Goo2amr
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Goo2amr. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. &mdash;-- That Guy, From That Show!  (talk) 2006-02-28 09:14Z 


 * Please do not recreate deleted articles. If you continue to add nonsense to wikipedia you may be blocked from editing. --Martyman- (talk) 09:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * This is your final warning if you recreate Goo2amr again you will be blocked from editing wikipedia. Please read WP:BIO and WP:VANITY for guidelines on what is acceptable for biography articles. --Martyman- (talk) 09:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Ignoring the fact the article is total nonsense, which part exactly of WP:BIO do you think makes this guy notable. You don't have to take my word for it, if you want the article re-created please go through Deletion review. I warn you that wikipedia is serious about not allowing nonsense to be posted and if you continue to do so you will be blocked. --Martyman- (talk) 09:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Again, I don't really care what you have to say. I think you are wrong and the article does not deserve to be on wikipedia. Please bring it up at Deletion review and someone may agree with you and re-create the page. If that happened I would not have a problem with it and would accept that I had wrongly deleted it. But, please do not go out of proccess and re-create the page or it will be seen as disregarding wikipedia's rules. --Martyman- (talk) 09:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree when you come to look at the deletion review page it is a bit duanting, it must be pretty much impossible for newcomers. You have to create a new section under todays date with a similar layout to the other entrys, describing what happened to the article and why you think it deserves to be undeleted. It might be easier to just wait and see if anyone else responds at Speedy deletions. --Martyman- (talk) 10:12, 28 February 2006 (UTC)