User talk:Ashcroftgm

Your edit to Bleckley County, Georgia
Hi Ashcroftgm, I reverted your edit to Bleckley County, Georgia and wante to drop you a note to let you know why. To include the type of biographical information you added, please familiarize yourself with the following Wikipedia guidlines and policies, Neutral Point of View and Biographies of living persons. Regards. --Roswell native 04:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't add copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 07:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. -WarthogDemon 07:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Professor Cooper
This was marked for deletion, and probably will be unless you can get some references in there, like reviews of his books. Please also check the bibliography, and add publisher and journal and date etc. in standard format. Academics are being deleted these days at a rapid rate. Move fast.DGG 01:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:41632656 mashhadani203.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:41632656 mashhadani203.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Harvey Fletcher.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Harvey Fletcher.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I will revert your changes to the Harvey Fletcher article shortly unless you can provide an appropriate source for the image. Or tell me, and I'll add the appropriate tags for you.  You can respond here. Dicklyon 17:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Vince_foster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vince_foster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Akish
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Akish, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Akish. Descartes1979 (talk) 21:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

File:Vince foster.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vince foster.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 20:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lithen
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lithen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Better suited to being part of the main article; which it already is.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 17:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scott Howell Campaign Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Scott Howell Campaign Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:14, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Howell and wife.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Howell and wife.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones (Talk) 17:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Akish for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Akish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 10:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)