User talk:Ashehata06

June 2016
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Thriller (song) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kaobear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thriller (song) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 10:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thriller (song). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Thriller (song) was changed by Ashehata06 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881115 on 2016-06-14T19:06:52+00:00.

Your edits to Thriller (song)
Please don't get frustrated. I'm not sure why your recent edits are being reverted as "test/vandalism". I agree with the first edit reverted as (from the edit summary) "heavy POV", but I don't know why another editor and an anti-vandalism bot are both rejecting the more recent ones. The first rejection might have been triggered because the reference tags weren't done properly and made a mess of the article. The second rejection by ClueBot NG? I'm not sure what triggered that. Sometimes past history can influence the decision algorithm.

Your latest edits seem not out of place, and properly sourced. Please don't get frustrated. If you want them to stick, it looks like you'll have to defend them on the talk page. I've got that on my watchlist, in case they need more support. Cheers. Willondon (talk) 19:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC) -- P.S. Editing Wikipedia isn't usually this onerous.