User talk:Asheq Siddiquee

Recent edits to Chudurbudur
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. We recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with our policies so we maycollaborate in the future. Thank you! 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 19:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chudurbudur


The article Chudurbudur has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:DICDEF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Chudurbudur
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. John of Cromer (talk) mytime= Sat 19:57, wikitime=  18:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Chudurbudur for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chudurbudur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chudurbudur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Help
I edited Imran Khan's Ideology adding a new topic of 1971 Bangladesh genocide in which his opinion stands unique what also has influenced his thoughts about War on terror. I added two newspaper link, one from Pakistan other from Bangladesh and also a more authentic reference of a video of his conversation about the fact. then it was "Reverted to revision 561513924 by Mar4d: Unsourced/ promotional, this is not a newspaper" by Justice007. so the edition in which a well refernced aspect of Imran khan was written hwas removed by Justice007. The true well referenced fact I added should be in the article. A video cannot be said to be unsourced or newspaper being of two different country can not be a reason for nullification. hakaluki88 19:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * What you wrote reads like a propaganda piece. If phrases such as "gravely shameful act" or "catastrophic sin" are Khan's, they should clearly be marked as quotes, with sources that support such wording (and your sources didn't support it - Khan only spoke of a "mistake"). YouTube is not a reliable source and should not be used here. Huon (talk) 23:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)