User talk:Ashershow1/Archive Index/

Regarding edits made during January 22 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the YouTube page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  The Nordic Goddess Kristen  Worship her 20:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Scripps National Spelling Bee has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Razorflame 00:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User:Kristen Eriksen constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 00:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as u did with this edit to Hebrew Academy of Long Beach. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Razorfl</b><b style="color:#6c6">am</b><b style="color:#6c3">e</b> 00:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Rambam Mesivta
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rambam Mesivta, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.rambam.org/pages/history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rambam Mesivta
A tag has been placed on Rambam Mesivta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 01:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 01:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Phil Ivey, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oo7565 (talk) 18:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Phil Gordon's Little Green Book
I have nominated Phil Gordon's Little Green Book, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Phil Gordon's Little Green Book. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shadowjams (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mini FTOPS
A tag has been placed on Mini FTOPS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 04:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mini FTOPS
A tag has been placed on Mini FTOPS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 18:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Akrigsman.gif
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Akrigsman.gif, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.autismgi.com/. As a copyright violation, File:Akrigsman.gif appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Akrigsman.gif has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Akrigsman.gif and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Akrigsman.gif with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Akrigsman.gif.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ibn (talk) 07:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

John Shershow
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Shershow, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.witnessdirectory.com/shershow. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Shershow
A tag has been placed on John Shershow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> ttonyb (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jimmy Fricke, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 00:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clay Duke


A tag has been placed on Clay Duke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 23:51, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clay Duke


A tag has been placed on Clay Duke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. <sup style="color:green;">Bongo  <sub style="margin-left:-4.2ex; color:blue;">matic  07:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Clay Duke for deletion
The article Clay Duke is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Clay Duke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <sup style="color:green;">Bongo  <sub style="margin-left:-4.2ex; color:blue;">matic  08:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Clay Duke was turned into a redirect to 2010 Panama City school board shootings. <b style="color:#5000cf">Ash</b><b style="color:#99cc">er</b><b style="color:#6666c9">sh</b><b style="color:#811c6">ow</b><b style="color:#1c3">1</b> 22:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Question for you on Commons
Hi Ashershow, I have posed a question to you at Commons:File talk:Clay Duke Gunman.tiff. Lady of  Shalott  02:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * There's a reply and additional question for you there, and a request for someone else to come help. Lady  of  Shalott  02:42, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Fake photo
It seems that you created a fake photo of Ginger Littleton's pocketbook. The real one is seen here. Why would you want to lie about this? It is a very poor reflection on your credibility. WWGB (talk) 07:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I had no intention of uploading a fake photo of Littleton's pocketbook. A google search returned an article with that picture in it and a caption saying this was Littleton's pocketbook (http://boylanblog.blogspot.com/).  Obviously that was not the truth, and I am currently working on getting a real picture of her pocketbook.  Thanks for your concern, and I apologize if there was any inadvertent wrongdoing.  Ashershow1 (talk) 19:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * WWGB might try a little WP:AGF. Lady  of  Shalott  01:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * While others might try a little WP:MYOB. WWGB (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I uploaded a photo of Ginger Littleton readying to hit Duke with her pocketbook. This one is obviously legit and I've included it in the Ginger Littleton section of 2010 Panama City school board shootings. <b style="color:#5000cf">Ash</b><b style="color:#99cc">er</b><b style="color:#6666c9">sh</b><b style="color:#811c6">ow</b><b style="color:#1c3">1</b> 03:19, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not so sure that it is "obviously legit" as the copyright probably rests with the school board who filmed the meeting from which the still was taken. I will leave it to others more familiar with Wikipedia copyright rules to make that call. Regards, WWGB (talk) 03:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Random Smiley Award
For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award. (Explanation and Disclaimer) ♠  TomasBat   01:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Ring 3D-theatrical release poster.tiff
 Thanks for uploading File:The Ring 3D-theatrical release poster.tiff. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust <sup style="color:#E3A857;">Talk  <sub style="color:#008000;">Contribs  15:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why the file page claims it is an orphaned image, because it clearly appears in the infobox of The Ring 3D. Seems like a perfectly reasonable fair use image.--Ashershow1talk 18:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Ring 3D-theatrical release poster.tiff


A tag has been placed on File:The Ring 3D-theatrical release poster.tiff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Phearson (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:The Ring 3D-theatrical release poster.tiff
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Ring 3D-theatrical release poster.tiff, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Phearson (talk) 21:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Insanity (Home exercise program)


A tag has been placed on Insanity (Home exercise program) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. ThePaintedOne (talk) 08:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I had replied on the talk page, but it got nuked a couple of seconds later. Two of the sources you put up were unsuitable as they were primary sources to websites owned by the company. The third was a reasonable secondary source, but just being reviewed by a fitness website does not demonstrate notabillity, which I imagine is why the reviewing admin has deleted it. The reason it was tagged for SD is because this is a duplicate of another article already speedied last night as promotional and didnt have any evidence showing this was a notable product. If you really want to put this page up I'd suggest building it in userspace first, with the emphasis on finding good quality secondary sources which show its a notable product, then copy to wikispace (possibly asking for an opinion from someone else first)--ThePaintedOne (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes it seems this article was deleted rather quickly; discussion was still unresolved. The review I listed was only one of dozens of reviews online of Insanity (I'll be glad to list more of them), and those blogs and reviews combined with official company websites makes Insanity just as notable as any standard WP product article.  I'm working on getting the article re-posted so we can continue discussion at its talk page.--Ashershow1talk • contribs 14:53, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beachbody Inc.


A tag has been placed on Beachbody Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. ThePaintedOne (talk) 08:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Jason Pooley
Hi. What would you like wikified? It looks reasonably wikified already. --Dweller (talk) 12:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The article seems to give four random sentences about Pooley, thus my tag, nevertheless I have reluctantly removed it due to the fact that Jason Pooley is a relatively good stub. --Ashershow1talk • contribs 21:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reverting. Your initial tagging made me wonder if you misunderstand the wikify tag and your reply emphasises the problem. If you take a quick look at Wikify it should help. An appropriate tag for Pooley's article might have been . Cheers. --Dweller (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)