User talk:Ashes2ashesdusty2dusty

Welcome!
Hello, Ashes2ashesdusty2dusty, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

September 2017
Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

New article created: please do not change the subject of existing articles
I have created a new article here please edit that article with your new person. the existing article has links connected with the origianl article's subect and you are just messing up the system. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Creating articles
Hey, I saw you were trying to make an article about a person with the same name as someone already with an article. You can't just repurpose an existing article to make it about someone else. As we are currently under the WP:ACTRIAL study, you are unable to make an article until your account is three days old, and has 10 mainspace (article) edits. If you're of the opinion that the topic you're writing about is notable (I haven't read into it), go to Draft:Peggy O'Neal (lawyer) and write it there. Then, when you're finished put  at the top to submit it to the WP:AFC queue. Cheers,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  11:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Anarchyte "There are 1,745 pending submissions in Category:Pending AfC submissions. Of these:

95 pending submissions in Category:AfC submissions by age/Very old have been waiting more than 1 month for reviewer attention. 154 pending submissions in Category:AfC pending submissions by age/4 weeks ago have been waiting 4 weeks for reviewer attention. 167 pending submissions in Category:AfC pending submissions by age/3 weeks ago have been waiting 3 weeks for reviewer attention." so I should have to wait up to a month to publish something because you can't be fucked reading the article? Does Wikipedia even want people to write articles any more? I spend an hour researching and writing and I get deleted and called a vandal?? She has been in every newspaper in Australia over the past week and all her predecessors have articles. Every other time I have written an article for Wikipedia I have had no problems like this. This is absolutely retarded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashes2ashesdusty2dusty (talk • contribs) 11:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand your frustration. The issue is that your edits, while in good faith, are disruptive. I've explained the issue above, and yes, the AfC times are ridiculous. I'll make the page Peggy O'Neal (lawyer) into a redirect to Richmond Football Club for you (because at the very least it's a viable redirect), and then that'll allow you to make the article. I hope that'll help you.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  11:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You can now access it at .  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  11:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peggy O'Neill. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. you just don't get it do you! IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ashes2ashesdusty2dusty has solved this problem for you "Wrong topic, please see the requesting user's talk page for more info" ........ so there is no need for you to use Requested move.  .......Also I have now opened up the redirect Anarchyte made for you and entered a basic bio paragraph. You can now complete the article using the text and sources you have already prepared (which by the way look quite good). Happy editing. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Btw, in expanding this administrator article, you may come across sources improve the others in Category:Richmond Football Club administrators. Good luck. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've taken the liberty of copying the content from WP:AWNB into the new article . Mitch Ames (talk) 12:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Great work!
Hi. Great work on the Peggy O'Neal article. Thank you very much for creating it. Sorry, the editors here gave you such a hard time instead of helping. If you need any help, please let me know. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)