User talk:Ashikpeter1994

Welcome!
Hello, Ashikpeter1994, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Ashikpeter1994/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:D0E2:ECD3:B550:48E0 (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ashikpeter1994/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Ashikpeter1994/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:D0E2:ECD3:B550:48E0 (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Worqa(Software) (July 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Worqa(Software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Worqa(Software), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Worqa(Software) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Worqa(Software) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Ashikpeter1994. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Worqa(Software), and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ashikpeter1994. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Worqa
I saw your request on IRC but you quit before I could answer. I've now taken a quick look at your userpage (I see the disclosure) and this talk page and see that you've already made some tries at writing about Worqa.

While it's allowed to edit on subjects where you have a conflict of interest, it's often very difficult to maintain the required neutral point of view.

So you've run into some snags.

It looks like Worqa is fairly new on the scene, so it may be rather difficult to find the notability references needed to satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for companies. Observe that we can't use: which narrows down the available options quite a bit. Some of these items are able to be used as sources for filling in information, but none of them help to establish notability - and notability is the very first step on the road to having an article.
 * interviews with the company's people
 * the company's own web site or publicity, or articles mainly based on press releases
 * "routine" business announcements such as rounds of funding or acquisitions (normally - some acquisitions get blown up in the press and thereby become notable)
 * business directory or registries
 * top "100" lists

I can't read the deleted pages, but if you're going to start over, I suggest starting with a very simple draft that has an opening statement like XYZ Company is an American manufacturer of electronic widgets, most notable for the auto-cromulizer. followed by a list of the references, three to four would be good, that represent the sort of in-depth, independent reporting on the company that form the basis for your notability argument. A draft like this can be brought to the Articles for Creation Help Desk for a summary review of whether these represent notability references (note, not "notable references", not "reliable sources") sufficient to base the article on. This work of assembling notability references is unavoidable, so there's no waste in taking this path. The agreement that these references establish notability at AFCHD is a permanent record that you can point to in future discussions.

Only after you have the set of notability references, does it make sense to begin to draft the body of the article. Summarize what those references say about the subject in as neutral a way as you can. You can use your own personal knowledge of the company to arrange things, but not to add anything to what the sources say. We realize that this is a very different writing task than most business writers are faced with every day, where message, promotion, and advocacy are more important. Here, those things pretty much must be avoided.

So, notability references and neutral point of view, that's the way to get an article started on Wikipedia. I hope this works out for you.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Worqa(Software) (September 2)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Worqa(Software) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Newslinger was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Unfortunately, Worqa is not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. You're welcome to submit another draft if the product becomes notable in the future. Please see Wikipedia's general notability guideline for details.

—  Newslinger  talk   09:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Worqa(Software)


Hello, Ashikpeter1994. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Worqa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)