User talk:Ashirvadtomar

Welcome!
Hello, Ashirvadtomar, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Fundraising, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Neil N  talk to me 07:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Tania Burstin


The article Tania Burstin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NPERSON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 12:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments on article
Hello, thank you for editing Wikipedia. I notice that most of your edits are on the topic of Mycause, its founder and business practices, and this leads me to wonder if you have some kind of connection or "conflict of interest" related to this company. This could for example be that they are paying you to write this article for SEO or marketing content purposes, that you are an employee or contractor for the company in any capacity or have a financial connection to it.

If so, you must disclose this immediately before making any more edits and avoid making edits or claims that could be considered promotional. Feel free to ask questions if this is something you want to discuss or if you are having trouble doing this, privately if necessary by email is fine.

All the best, let me know if you need any help and hope this is useful to you. Blythwood (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tania Burstin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tania Burstin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tania Burstin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. shoy (reactions) 14:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tania Burstin mycause.png
Thanks for uploading File:Tania Burstin mycause.png, which you've attributed to mycause. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Mycause. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Laser brain  (talk)  18:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Neil N  talk to me 18:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Crowdfunding. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. -- GB fan 01:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)