User talk:Ashishchandradev

Rajesh Khanna
In Rajesh Khanna wiki article there is serious need to change the para of his death. He died of cancer. References http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/celebrity/rajesh-khanna-was-suffering-from-cancer-for-the-past-one-year_115624.htm and http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/news/2012/rajesh-khanna-last-wish-097591.html. It s clear from these artiles that Khanna died of cancer and that though he and his family members knew he was ill a year ago, Khanna had insisted that the news of him being ill and having cancer need not be divulged to the public till after his death. Mumtaz, his close freind and co-star makes it clear in the artcile - http://www.indianexpress.com/news/rajesh-khanna-was-very-close-to-me-mumtaz/976166/ and http://www.filmitadka.in/201207192481/news/mumtaz-and-sharmila-tagore-share-rajesh-khanna-memories.html that Khanna was suffering from cancer and had met him a month before his death. Mumtaz has made it clear and read the 4 artciles i have given above. It was cancer due to which he became slim from 2011-2012.Another refernce says he died of cancer. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Demand-grows-for-Rajesh-Khanna-DVDs/articleshow/15170006.cms. Its hightime that wiki artcile is corrected and its mentioned that Khanna died of Cancer.Onceshook1 (talk) 09:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Edit and remove only these lines - " Dr Trivedi, a spokesman for the hospital, said that he cannot confirm the nature of the illness. However, a friend who acted as his spokesman during the illness had said his food intake had decreased over the previous days and he was "very weak. Onceshook1 (talk) 09:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. ''See WP:REFSPAM. '' MER-C 10:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Vaidyanath Jyotirlinga, Deogarh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ''You have been warned before about reference spamming. Please stop now. '' Biker Biker (talk) 06:48, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Calmer  Waters  07:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Why did you ignored your warnings and what do you intend to do if unblocked? Max Semenik (talk) 09:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Dear Administrators, I was blocked for spamming my website links. I plead you to unblock me, with a promise to not spam again and that I will now onward stick to all editing guidelines. I am feeling guilty and I also feel that everyone should be given a chance on their first mistake if they convince to not do that mistake again. We are humans and not robots and simply ignoring human feelings is disturbing and unjust.


 * There is a saying: "You never get a second chance to make a first impression." The first impression you provided of yourself resulted in your account being blocked.


 * Nevertheless, you are being given a second chance. That is what unblock requests are for. So far, however, your unblock requests have failed to convince. I have already explained my reasoning for declining your unblock request above. Please post another one that demonstrates your understanding of the policies and guidelines mentioned above, and another administrator will hopefully consider it more favorably. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Um... do you understand that you cannot contribute your personal knowledge on Wikipedia unless you can back it up by reliable and verifiable sources that are independent of you? ~Amatulić (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. I was blocked for putting my website's references along-with information. So, I understand now that only highly reliable references should be cited. Administrators, please be kind on my first mistake and unblock me. Now onwards, I will act responsibly and won't repeat the mistake again. It's a promise to Wikipedia and to myself. Warm regards.

Thank you Wikipedia. You are so kind and beautiful. I'll try to make you a better place. Thanks a lot.