User talk:AshleyWitt

February 2021
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2021—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2021, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 2021 was changed by AshleyWitt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959528 on 2021-02-18T02:51:10+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 2021 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

And I can 100% agree that you are a sock puppet of Pcgmsrich. Kyu (talk) 03:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 03:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 41339
 has been declined. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that either the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks for more information. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 21:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)