User talk:Ashley Rowe


 * Your sandbox has been restored as not solely promotional. The reference you have originated as a press release . I do notice a handful of imitators Typosquatting or with suffixes, attempting to capitalize off of its obvious success. Dru of Id (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Dru of Id, your help is much appreciated. I'll keep working on my article.

In response to your feedback
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for creating an account and thank you for your feedback. This page might answer some of your questions about what is allowed, also look at other articles about companies to see what editors have done.

Harkey (talk) 14:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FeralOink (talk) 06:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Ashley Rowe. Yes, certainly, I will have a look-see. I'll leave any suggestions for you on my own talk page, okay? They'll be immediately following your message to me, from earlier today. The problem I had with the article, which was about the website, was notability. There were claims made that would possibly have established notably, but I could find no evidence supporting those claims with facts. There are a good number of Facebook likes, but is that equivalent to fans on Facebook?


 * "Leading" and "most popular" can be determined very quickly by running a website through Compete or Hitwise or Alexa to confirm page view count over time. I don't want to start doing that sort of research about your submission. It was not citied in the press releases, and there was no evidence of that sort. It is accepted practice (among SEO and web analysts) to show such results, in order to prove that the site has the stature it claims. I visited Asia Food Recipes, and thought it was a sweet, cute, delightfully pink and charming website, by the way! But claims that are quantitatively verifiable require proof. It isn't important to be THE biggest traffic website in Asian Food Recipes, as Compete, Hitwise etc. use different criteria, so there will be variations! But a major website gets a lot of pageviews a day, which is proof that it is already popular, rather than trying to become popular. --FeralOink (talk) 13:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Asia Food Recipe concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Asia Food Recipe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)