User talk:Ashleydf/sandbox

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scream_%26_Shout&action=history This article shows evidence of a edit war because User:Baffle_gab1978 and User:Sauloviegas keep changing each others edits. One is saying their edits dont make any sense while the other user deletes the edit completely. Each user is nit picking at each other edits.

Name of student reviewer: Jasmine R Basnight

Date of review 05/06/13

Name of Editor: Ashley De Freitas

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ashleydf/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:05/06/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/06/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Great

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A

Wikiformatting: The formatting is fine

Grammar & composition: Good

Other comments: This review is for Member Exchange Theory

Name of student reviewer: Jasmine R Basnight

Date of review 05/06/13

Name of Editor: Ashley De Freitas

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ashleydf/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:05/06/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/06/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): good

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): yes it is accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A

Wikiformatting: The correct formatting was used

Grammar & composition: Good

Other comments: This review is for the Hierarchy of needs theory

Peer review
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel

Date of review 05/06/2013

Name of editor: Ashleydf

URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ashleydf

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013

Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013

Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length of edit

Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided directly from text the text book

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition Grammar and spelling were error free

Other comments Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Trinirebel (talk) 03:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer review
Name of student reviewer: Nikicia

Date of review: May 7, 2013

Name of editor: Ashleydf

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ashleydf

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: May 7,2013

Date review submitted to instructor: May 7, 2013

Length of edit (too long/too short): Edit length is appropriate

Image (needed/appropriate): None needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Article is adequate and relates to I/O Psychology

Wikiformatting: Good

Grammar & composition: Good

Other comments: Good editNikicia (talk) 07:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
(MsNika349 (talk) 02:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC))

Textbook Peer Review
Hmehta0120 (talk) 23:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

=Article Peer Review=

Hmehta0120 (talk) 23:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
{| class="wikitable"

! Name of student reviewer !! Wikipedia User:Angela Sandy Angela Sandy (talk) 04:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Date of review || 5/13/2013
 * Name of editor|| Wikipedia User:Ashleydf
 * URL of editor’s Userpage ||http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ashleydf
 * Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page || 05/13/13
 * Date review submitted to instructor || 05/13/13
 * Length of edit (too long/too short) || The length is good
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || n/a
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Textbook info is accurate
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed ||N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || Accurate article for I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar & compostition is good
 * Other comments|| Don't forget to site when you are going to make the edit to article
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || n/a
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Textbook info is accurate
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed ||N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || Accurate article for I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar & compostition is good
 * Other comments|| Don't forget to site when you are going to make the edit to article
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar & compostition is good
 * Other comments|| Don't forget to site when you are going to make the edit to article
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar & compostition is good
 * Other comments|| Don't forget to site when you are going to make the edit to article
 * Other comments|| Don't forget to site when you are going to make the edit to article