User talk:Ashmay1999/sandbox

Evaluating an article
You've chosen lots of good articles. The one you evaluated is relatively in recent a probably fast developing (check its edit history to see if that's true). I agree that it could use some style editing and more content, but there may be some challenges. First, read the talk page. On it, someone correctly pointed out that this is an article about the children, not the experiment itself. (I assume a separate article on experiment exists. Is it hyperlinked in the article? Is it an article you might prefer to work on?) That means you should restrict yourself to content directly related to the children. The same goes for the scientist - he also has a separate article on WP. In short, this may be a great article to work on, and stylistic changes would be helpful. You'd also want to add some content, though, and for that you should see if there are good news sources. Has anyone followed up recently to see how the girls are doing? Josef Horáček (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I see that you've considered several other articles. I would say that more specific articles (for example, biographies of scientists) should be easier to work on than more general articles, but much will depend on what sources you find, so the choice is yours. I see that you already found some excellent sources. Your next step is to specify which article you want to work on. Add it to the dashboard and make a special section for it at the top of your sandbox. List the changes you're hoping to make and post your sources. Josef Horáček (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Editing an Article
I like your proposed changes so far. Adding new sections makes sense. You say you're planning to add more information - is it coming from a new source? Start adding your changes to the mainspace, including any new sources you're using. Also add the sources to the sandbox so I can find them easily. Josef Horáček (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Final Assessment
Great job adding sourcing and clarifying the information. The article in Lulu and Nana is much improved. Josef Horáček (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)