User talk:Ashok771kakki

January 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anjali (film actress) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anjali (film actress) was changed by Ashok771kakki (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886089 on 2018-01-07T11:30:39+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hansika Motwani. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hansika Motwani was changed by Ashok771kakki (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963798 on 2018-01-07T11:34:58+00:00.

Constructive editing
Hi there, the bulk of your recent edits do not appear to be very constructive. This, this, this, this, and I can't figure out what your point was with these comments, where you seem to be editorialising about Nayanthara's boyfriends. If you're here to be constructive, please find constructive ways to edit. These unsourced and sloppy additions don't strike me as very useful for a neutral encyclopedia. Also, we expect editors to be able to write names properly, using proper capitalisation. Please elevate your edits in the future, please don't submit any unsourced content, and please only discuss specific improvements to articles on article talk pages. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Keethy Suresh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Diffs: Your edits are unsourced, the content reading "laughs beautifully wack" doesn't make sense in English, and once again, proper nouns (like people's names) are capitalised. If you can't type people's names correctly, you should get used to your edits being reverted on site. Sloppy edits and unsourced content won't be tolerated. If English is not your primary language, perhaps you should edit at a Wikipedia in your native tongue.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * For this. You're clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)