User talk:Ashwani.mpct

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Bisen, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

I am myself a bisen rajput... also i provided some bettrt link of some books but before i publish you made it unpublished... so from now before doing any change do not forget to discuss it with me. What ever i have added is based on my research and information collected from villages of bisen rajput

October 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bisen. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Please note that removing my earlier comments, as you have done, is deemed to be an acknowledgement that you have read them. The specific issues in question are not negotiable: your own research counts for nothing and your sources are generally considered not to be reliable, even if you had correctly cited the things. - Sitush (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

I Gave the reference of books and specified page number as well..... now what proof you want... if you continue to undo changes i shall ask wikipedia to move this page to protected page category... i have submitted the supporting in cluded supporting references.. go through them


 * Thanks for talking. Your sources were all unreliable, eg: something from Blogspot, the well-known unreliable books of James Tod, and the equally unreliable other British Raj authors. There is a consensus that these sources should not be used to verify statements made on Wikipedia. There was also a problem with how you were citing the things but it is not worth worrying about that at the moment - you can read WP:Citing sources for more information regarding how we do it. Thanks again. - Sitush (talk) 17:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If you do not revert this reinstatement (use the "undo" option) then you are going to be blocked from contributing here. You've had the warnings and the explanations, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 17:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I've temporarily protected the page. Note that you could have been blocked for edit warring, so please don't do that again. Get WP:CONSENSUS first. --regentspark (comment) 18:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)