User talk:Ashwin4591

Speedy deletion nomination of Future consumer


A tag has been placed on Future consumer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  D My Son  11:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Internal audit, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * We removed all external links Ashwin4591 (talk) 06:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * "We"? Is this account being used by more than one person? – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 06:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Apologies. I mean I. 124.123.104.199 (talk) 06:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I am the only one using this account. 124.123.104.199 (talk) 07:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Qualityze


A tag has been placed on Qualityze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Pika voom Talk 06:41, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Ashwin4591 (talk) 10:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I have not used wikipedia for any advertising and promotion so far. Kindly check my contributions. Nowhere i mentioned about any brands or services and not even external links. Kindly check and unblock. Ashwin4591 (talk) 10:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Ashwin4591 (talk) 11:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:GAB explains how to craft an unblock request. Your contributions have been unambiguously promotional so you'll want to try a different approach once you figure out how to write an unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 11:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Ashwin4591 (talk) 11:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, please. I say again, your contributions were unambiguously promotional. If you keep claiming they weren't, there's no chance you'll be unblocked. Additionally, you still seem unable to follow the instructions given in WP:GAB on how to write an unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 11:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Here's a sample of some of the marketing garbage you were spewing. "one of the leading FMCG company of India", "equipped with world class food processing units", "Future consumer is the flagship company", "SaaS solution provider that delivers next-generation quality management solutions", "This innovation-driven company sets new benchmarks for the solution provided to continuously exceed the quality of the products and services for customer satisfaction", "leading provider of smarter quality solutions", and that's just for starters. This is some of the worst promotional garbage I've ever seen here. It would be bad enough on a company's marketing site. It has no place in an encyclopedia. If you truly don't understand this, you fundamentally lack sufficient competence to edit here and need to stop making unblock requests. The only unblock requests we'll consider are ones where you admit to your spam and tell us how your future edits would be significantly different and how you'd stop violating WP:UPE. Otherwise, you are just deliberately wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 11:35, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Ashwin4591 (talk) 11:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I'll lay on my standard WP:G11 notice. But I see you had previous WP:ARTSPAM deleted, so I'll just be hoping for the best. Cheers. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 12:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

As you are clearly deliberately wasting our time, I have protected this page for 24 hours. This will give you a chance to read and thoroughly understand WP:GAB, which you haven't bothered to do yet. It will also give you a chance to read WP:SPAM and WP:NOTADVERTISING. If you continue as you have so far, expect to permanently lose talk page access. So, stop. Read the policies and guidelines. Take no further action until you thoroughly understand them and can demonstrate you thoroughly understand them. --Yamla (talk) 12:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)



Hello, Ashwin4591. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Qualityze has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat.

''PS. If writing ad copy and stuff like mission statements is what you are used to, then leaving all that promocruft out might be hard. Writing an encyclopedia is very different. Maybe this will help you understand better. Also, you might benefit from reading and heeding WP:COI and WP:PAID. Best'' -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 12:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)


 * PPS-- In the future, leave out the "nowiki" tags so your unblock request templates will work. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 12:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 11:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)