User talk:Ashwin Arun

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 11:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Meditation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   12:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Go slow
Hi, I notice that you have been editing the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh at a frantic pace, without writing edit summaries and labeling all of the edits as "minor edits." The sources you are using seem questionable. I suggest that you go slow with your edits and give clear explanations of the rationale. Your edits run into the danger of getting reverted en masse and you would have simply wasted your time. - Kautilya3 (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop
Hello Ashwin Arun, please stop making these superfast edits to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh with very little support from reliable sources. I have tried to clean up a little, but it is far too big a task to do anything with the huge number of edits you are doing. , can you please provide some advice to this user? - Kautilya3 (talk) 21:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

''It doesn't help to edit-war when the material is contentious. Please discuss the issues on the article talk page as per WP:BRD. '' Kautilya3 (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Final warning
It appears that you are not here to contribute constructively as you seem to be intent on pushing a point of view and removing any content and sources that don't fit in with that. You also don't seem to understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopaedia. Any further such disruption is going to result in you being blocked and/or banned from the topic area. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You don't seem to be listening. You're continuing the same type of edits again. Please stop or I will block you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, as you did at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sahaja Yoga Child.jpg


The file File:Sahaja Yoga Child.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * no encyclopedic value

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)