User talk:Asiaworldcity

Speedy deletion nomination of MTR Service Update


A tag has been placed on MTR Service Update requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Scopecreep (talk) 13:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Iomazenil
It is too early to say that Iomazenil can "stop alcohol making people drunk", as you wrote. That is not supported by the references or by scientific research. I've revamped the article to add information about its origins, activity, and use in research. Fences &amp;  Windows  17:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: About Windows RT
Manufacturers are also allowed to build Windows RT-based laptops. I'm looking for the video where that was said. Either way, the information is already listed below your chart, so the chart is redundant. - Josh (talk | contribs) 22:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't hear about Windows RT on laptop, can you give me some references? I make a chat is because refer to Windows 8 Minimum hardware requirements for Windows 8 Release Preview. I think the information list with point form is very hard to read. Asiaworldcity (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Changing it to chart format is a good idea, but only one copy of the list should be in the article. - Josh (talk | contribs) 22:25, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I can change the name to Windows table Minimum hardware requirements and delate the repeat information. Asiaworldcity (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The title should make it clear that it's only the requirements for certification. Also I found the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYSSdSNFjhU - skip to 22:43. - Josh (talk | contribs) 22:43, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Internet Explorer for Xbox


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Internet Explorer for Xbox. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Internet Explorer. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Internet Explorer - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 01:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Windowstorelogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Windowstorelogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Windowstorelogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Windowstorelogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 03:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blessings Garden


A tag has been placed on Blessings Garden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. heather walls (talk) 08:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Windowstorelogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Windowstorelogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PC+, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Turner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Omaha High School (Arkansas)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. While I appreciate your zeal in reviewing the article I just created at Omaha High School (Arkansas), the article is fully referenced and no content listed within the article is without reference. Extracurricular activities are all sourced from the Arkansas Activities Association page of the school, the basis of curriculum content is consistent throughout the state of Arkansas and is listed within the Arkansas Department of Education article. Thanks, but I would like to remove the tag you placed. 15:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Windows RT Edit War (sigh)
Please contribute to the poll on Talk:Windows RT. (You are being asked because you commented on MS Surface.) Tuntable (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roomba, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IR and RF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Please open a discussion in the talk page of PC+ to discuss this current topic. Redirect without discussion is not acceptable. Asiaworldcity (talk) 21:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=574246881 your edit] to Old Supreme Court Building, Hong Kong may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The Old Supreme Court Building, also called the Legislative Council Building (立法會大樓/立法局大樓), was the home of

Re: PC+
You're only being protective of the article because you created it. Please read WP:PAGEDECIDE; the concept of "PC+" is not notable on its own. Only when viewed within the contexts of "post-PC" is it notable. Since this is the general term that has caught on for such a trend, and I see no real "difference" between them, it has to be a single article. Aside from your vague assertion of "two different meaning", they are fundamentally the same.

And also, on your assertion that all mergers require discussion, I'm only being bold. You're taking this into a bold/revert/discuss cycle, and I do not want that. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:13, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MTR Service Update


A tag has been placed on MTR Service Update requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Wefk423 (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blessings Garden


The article Blessings Garden has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this is a notable building. Refs are apparently routine listings, not in-depth reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)