User talk:Asifmomin03

November 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sruti Mohapatra has been reverted. Your edit here to Sruti Mohapatra was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/sruti.mohapatra.3) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Copyright, promotion, and advice on editing
For both those reasons the page has been deleted.
 * It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. We certainly cannot accept content previously published on a web site which shows the copyright notice "© 2017 | All right Reserved" without very good evidence.
 * The page which you created at Template:Anjali International Children's Festival was unambiguously written to promote the festival, and to persuade the reader that it is a good thing. A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral point of view, and Wikipedia policy does not permit such promotional editing.

My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start.

Also, the page was not a template, and should not have had "Template:" as the prefix to its title. A better title would have been Draft:Anjali International Children's Festival. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. No Wikipedia article should contain such laudatory language as "she has emerged as the perfect role model", "Her life is storybook material and a lesson in personal courage", and so on, no matter how strongly you feel such praise may be deserved. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. You have ignored the messages above, and continued both to post content copied from other web sites and to post content which is unambiguously promotional. For both those reasons, either of which alone would have been sufficient, the article Sruti Mohapatra has been deleted, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. Please take note of the messages you have been given, and take care not to continue to make the same mistakes, as otherwise sooner or later you will be blocked from editing by an administrator. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sruti Mohapatra


A tag has been placed on Sruti Mohapatra, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/sruti-mohapatra-gives-the-disabled-opportunities-she-never-had/207321. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Lourdes  12:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing exactly the kind of editing that you were warned would lead to being blocked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)