User talk:AskTheBush

May 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Britannia Secondary School— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Britannia Secondary School with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Britannia Secondary School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Britannia Secondary School. Meters (talk) 02:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Britannia Secondary School. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Eric Troung does not have an article and is apparently not notable. The Carnegie Crackhead league MVP sounds suspiciously like a WP:BLP violation. Stop adding this material. Meters (talk) 02:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)