User talk:Askarion

Wed Dec 6: Hacking Night + job listing
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation
Hi Askarion. :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 00:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reaching out! I'll respond either today or tomorrow. 〜 Askarion   ✉  02:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Thu Jan 4: Hacking Night + Wikipedia Day soon
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Hey
I found proof about Andrew Tate record wanna reach out to me I’ll show u 92.99.23.150 (talk) 13:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello – you can make such requests on the article's talk page. Be sure to include proof in the form of reliable sources in your initial post. 〜 Askarion   ✉  16:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Thu Feb 8 NYC Hacking Night + Feb 21 WikiWednesday
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Tue March 5: Wiki Gala NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

WikiNYC: 3/14 Hacking Night + 3/16 Queens Name Explorer
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback
Hello again. I would like to offer you some respectful feedback on our "Han shot first" conversation. I hope you will find the feedback constructive and useful, and not accusatory. I am offering it from a place of goodwill. Here is the beginning of your first comment in the conversation:

"Merge the pages "at some point"? It seems you've done that already."

Was this commentary necessary? The rest of your comment perfectly conveys your feeling that I should have gone about things differently. We both know I didn't merge the pages, and I very clearly used the phrase "officially merge". In your comment, you dropped the word "official", which results in a misrepresentation of what I said.

I am guessing your comment was borne out of irritation, annoyance or frustration with my bold action. Next time, it would be more helpful and constructive if you could simply state your feelings, such as "I find this type of bold action irritating," or "I'm feeling annoyed that you went about things this way." Otherwise, I am left sitting with your comment and wondering where it's coming from.

Thanks again for offering your valuable perspective on the merge. Your comment made me aware of the problems with it. Wafflewombat (talk) 21:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello again — I was (and still am) unsure that boldly merging the contents of Han shot first to Han Solo without a merge discussion was a good idea. WP:MERGEPROP suggests that, without a merge discussion, content should only be moved from one article to another if the need for a merge is obvious, and also that articles that have been separate for a long time should usually be discussed first. I think Han shot first is well sourced and independently notable, so I wouldn't consider this a case where the need for a merge is obvious, but other editors would need to weigh in first. I personally think the content should be removed from Han Solo in the meantime but I also don't think this is that big of a deal so I won't revert them myself. 〜 Askarion   ✉  02:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand your views about my decision to merge the content without a discussion. You clearly explained this perspective on the talk page. My comment above was about how you communicated, not about your views. Can you see, from my view, how the beginning of your original comment might feel hurtful?
 * I have reverted the edits. Wafflewombat (talk) 02:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, don't answer that question. I'm making a big deal out of nothing. Have a good day 🙂 Wafflewombat (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)