User talk:Asketbouncer

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Asketbouncer! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Task Center
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes ( ~ ) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 20:36, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Franz Haniel moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Franz Haniel, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 20:41, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ilia Novikov


The article Ilia Novikov has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Accomplished but not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Franz Haniel


Hello, Asketbouncer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Franz Haniel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

PRODs
Hello, Asketbouncer,

I have removed PROD tags you placed on articles because you provided no rationale for a deletion. Leaving a comment in an edit summary is not enough, you have to explain in the PROD tag why the article should be deleted. I recommend using Twinkle because it will prompt you to provide an explanation when it places the tag on the page. It will also notify the page creator of the PROD tagging which is an important step in any deletion process. Liz Read! Talk! 21:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Liz thanks a lot! --Asketbouncer (talk) 12:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Chernyakhiv (Kaharlyk district) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Chernyakhiv (Kaharlyk district), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  10:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Refs
Hi, I inadvertentley deleted your tag, please feel free to add it, if you want. Thanks.Ode+Joy (talk) 17:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * it's fine. thanks for noticing me :) Asketbouncer (talk) 17:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, Thanks. Ode+Joy (talk) 18:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adetunji Delpaneaux Wills


A tag has been placed on Adetunji Delpaneaux Wills requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks for that! I should have done that after moving to draft the article. --Asketbouncer (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Question
we communicated a year ago on my talk page. I would like to ask for your help with my block. Can you say why I'm blocked. I cannot get why and the reasons given by admins are quite obscure. --Asketbouncer (talk) 12:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. Sorry, I can only reiterate information which has already been shared with you, that you appear to be a sockpuppet of another user. What I can add is that  is an excellent, tireless contributor over at SPI.  What I can add is that your beliefs and/or views are NOT the reason for your block.  You've requested an admin to look into reviewing your block, I would suggest that you wait for their response, and, if necessary, open a dialogue with them.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Asketbouncer, the technical evidence shows an exact overlap with. WP:CHECKUSER goes into a bit more detail and I'm rather limited in what I'm allowed to say about the technical evidence. Note that account is blocked as a sockpuppet of, so we are still just talking about a single case here, just a case involving multiple accounts (as is always the case with violations of WP:SOCK). --Yamla (talk) 14:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)