User talk:Asksiri

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Asksiri! Your additions to Toa Payoh ritual murders have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 04:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi
 * 80% of the changes I had made were in my own words. But 100% has been removed. Asksiri (talk) 07:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There are many inaccuracies in the article, for instance, it talks about how Tan reaps benefits from conning others - she herself was forced into prostitution and was sexually abused. I'd rewritten all these in my own words and all the changes have been removed. Asksiri (talk) 07:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The entire article did not mention the extreme violence inflicted on the women at all and portrayed the women as perverse, equal partners of the crimes. The article is very off mark. It also left out what the private psychs said and framed it such that the private psychs look like they were issuing baseless opinions. The entire article was biased towards the government psychs and Adrian Lim. Asksiri (talk) 08:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd edited wrongly and given too many in-line citations, making it look like I'd lifted the content. Most of my writing is original. If you can reinstate all my edits, I will edit them immediately, and also ensure that I paraphrase anything that has been lifted.
 * One comment was that I had used Wordpress as a source. Some of the info in the article, which did not provide citation, was wrong and others were distorted. I can remove my dubious sources and the original inaccuracies at the same time. Asksiri (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)