User talk:Aslinga

The point of Wikipedia is to provide information, not opinions. The term creationism sneaks an opinion in. You would probably not want to see the term evolutionism on Wikipedia. So regardless of your opinion, it is important on Wikipedia to present nothing more than the fact, and there are a number of people who believe creation is a fact.

February 2008
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

I'm assuming you are the same user as User talk:38.100.217.177, since you post a message defending yourself to that talk page. --RenniePet (talk) 10:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I am the same user, Changing the term creationism to creation is hardly vandalism, as a matter of fact it is what wikipedia needs, an unbiased piece of information. Is that something you understand? Do you understand what creationism implies? probably not. Think of the term evolutionism, now do you understand? Realize that your opinion is not the only one.

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Panspermia has not a shred to do with Creation. Furthermore, your choice to refer me to these articles shows that you are either biased or simply do not understand what lies at the bottom of this issue. I hope it is the latter. It has nothing to do with correctness or theories, or whatever it is you think it is. It is about the neutrality of an opinion. And not that it matters or anything, but it is very unlikely that you know more about the creation theory than I do. So next time, save the article references. And I have given up on wikipedia, evolutionists can continue having their field days on it.