User talk:Asolunia

December 2016
Hello, I'm Full Rune. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Amanda Peet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Full Rune Speak, child of Guthix 18:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Peet. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Amanda Peet was changed by Asolunia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927738 on 2016-12-25T17:07:38+00:00.

Recent edit to Amanda Peet
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Amanda Peet), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)