User talk:Aspaa

Welcome!
Hello, Aspaa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 20:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

April 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Eurovision Song Contest's Greatest Hits, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see WikiProject Eurovision/Format and Guides for more details.  Wes Mouse &#124; T@lk  17:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Scissor Sisters
Hey. Since it's an American article, meager is preferred. Thank you! ~  Nott Nott   let's talk! contrib 00:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Egghead06. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joey Barton has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Egghead06 (talk) 18:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * BBC News (TV channel)
 * added a link pointing to Huw Edwards


 * The Film Review
 * added a link pointing to Ben Brown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at George Gardiner (politician), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * That warning seems a little strong for what appears to be a good faith edit. Do you think I'm missing something? I realize you are using a template, but the wording suggest this is a continuing problem while it looks to me like a one-off issue and maybe not even disruptive.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  21:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Christmas Message, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2017 London attack ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Royal_Christmas_Message check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Royal_Christmas_Message?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Merger Proposal
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Public Space Protection Order&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPCW (talk • contribs) 12:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BBC News (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Watson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

June 2022
Bakkster Man (talk) 13:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Learn!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_COVID-19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.252.209 (talk) 16:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * based 2601:603:217F:AFC0:E430:2B21:2CB5:240B (talk) 02:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Why I reverted your post at Talk:Eugenics
It truly breaks my heart to read this, but you still cannot use the article talk page as a WP:FORUM. I hope that makes sense. If you have specific changes, backed up by reliable sources, which you would like to discuss, feel free to discuss them.

Also, since this is a user talk page, I'll offer this: I am just one person, but I believe that you have worth and value just as you are. People who talk about "genetic quality" are making subjective judgements dressed up like science. They are simply wrong. There is not and never has been any scientific rationale for judging one person's qualities to be better than another's. One set of qualities may be more fitted to a given environment, but if that environment were to change, another set of qualities might be favored. There is no absolute position from which to judge fitness apart from environment. And of course we humans largely create our environment, though by no means with perfect control. And then there is the mistaken view that homogeneity is always beneficial for a species. It isn't. Rather, diversity –– including neurodiversity –– is a strength. Eugenics is rightly described as pseudoscience because it ignores these and other facts. Generalrelative (talk) 02:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Ah, but it's not actually my own thought but arose from more than one person away from Wikipedia thinking this - I would have had sources at the time more so to back this up and may take more time to find where I originally found them now, would have kept a record if I had edited the article itself but I felt it was highly contested and therefore used the talk page. I therefore was not using the talk page as a forum for my own original thought, instead based on other people's thoughts not merely my own. Even if this may not have been obvious to people just reading the talk page. The general position is that it is still a fringe theory and wouldn't be accepted that it was mainstream. However, that is by the bias in the definition itself as if it was mainstream-accepted, the mainstream would then never accept that it was. So, by definition, it will always fail based on what is generally considered to be the case. Despite the fact the view is held by people beyond myself and does appear to have evidenced basis as much of the rest of society has fallen into groupthink, cognitive dissonance and normalization of deviance (again, not just my idea) - but, again, it is just exhaustive and would require hours of work for me to find all the sources to back myself up on this so therefore in practice I am effectively prevented from doing so, as we all have limited resources/ability. Aspaa (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)