User talk:Aspat25

Welcome
Hello, Aspat25 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text:  on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Aspat25, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Anthony Spataro Reflective essay
My reflection essay Anthony Spataro Critiquing articles: I listened to what my peers aid and fixed what I had to. My peers gave helpful advice and when I saw what they said I realized adding it to my own paper would help a lot. I took the same route in reviewing others articles; I do not care about hurting feelings you have to tell them how it is so they can succeed. I made sure to check over my peers because they either had small contributions or nothing sourced so I told them to fix it. Summarizing your contributions: I did my own article about modern cyber security. I feel as I brought a different spin or point of view to the previous articles and covered things they did not have in them. My article rounded out the preventions of cyber attacks in modern cyber security Peer review: What did your peers recommend you change on your article? My peers liked my article; they just told me to remove a sentence which was, you could ay bias. I was talking about how business need cyber security more than regular consumers but that is not always true so I removed it. Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback? I did not receive ay feedback with my article. Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important? I learned that Wikipedia can easily have fake news or become manipulated; but with the right people and motives it can be a great repository of knowledge. It is important to understand cyber security because since everything is shifting towards computers and technology, it is creating a whole new realm of possibilities for criminals. It helps you become safe in this new and exciting era of technology.

Moved to userspace
Hi, I moved your article to User:Aspat25/Modern Cyber Security. I saw that another user had proposed it for deletion, stating that it was too similar to the article on computer security. Offhand I do have to agree with them, now that I look at the similarity between the two pages. I think that there may be merit in changing this to be an article on the overall history of computer security, as there are pages on various different events and a page that gives an overall timeline of security hacking, but not a prose type page or section. Other than this, there are still some issues with first person writing (it should be in third person) and subjective terms or phrases such as "it is important". The issue with subjective language is that it comes across as a single opinion or perspective, which goes against Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines. We can't say if one thing is important or not. We can say that others have stated that something is important, but it's not something that we ourselves can do as editors. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)