User talk:Asperges me

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Asperges me, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Filing Flunky (talk) 17:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Help request
Thanks for your words of encouragement but my efforts mmay be in vain following the notice about general notability. Puzzled as to what more to add and also find it hard to see the differences between this entry and many other choir histories? Grateful for any advice. Asperges Me
 * I'm guessing you're attempting to communicate with the editor that posted the welcome message above. To communicate with others directly, simply click on the link to their "talk page", that is provided in a link in their signature. You can provide you own signature (placed after your comments), along with a link to your talk page, by adding four tildes (located at the top left corner of your keyboard), i.e., ~ . That said, I'm also guessing you are seeking some guidance on the Brighton Chamber Choir article, where I noticed a notability tag. In essence, maintenance tags are placed on articles to help editors identify areas that need improvement. The tag offers some advice, along with a link for further information. In order to establish notability, the article requires support through significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the choir itself, affiliates, employees, and partners. The article at this point, relies on primary sources, rather than independent, secondary sources, to support content. None of the sources offer significant coverage of the subject. Lacking notability, the article could feasibly be presented for a community discussion, resulting in deletion. In order to avoid this, we need to find references that meet the threshold for significance, reliability, and independence. Meeting this threshold is most likely the difference between other articles and the Brighton one. That said, there are often other articles that do not meet the criteria, but have yet to be detected by volunteers for assessment and/or cleanup. Let's focus on the Brighton article and make sure it meets the criteria to remain. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 14:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Brighton Chamber Choir
Hello Cindamuse, Thank you for your reply and your time. Much appreciated. It's hard to find absolute primary sources for an entity such as a choir, even if it has been around for over 3 decades! I have linked to existing Wikipedia entries wherever possible, Paul Brough, Sir John Taverner, Sir Simon Rattle etc but apart from the entry in the official Register of Charities, it's hard "to prove" the choir's existence! Any suggestions in that regard would be very welcome. Kind Regards(Asperges me (talk) 20:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)).