User talk:Asqueladd/Archive008

__NOINDEX__

Thank you very much and another question
Muchas gracias Asqueladd. Perdona por mi "rigidez" al editar, realmente me ha sido muy útil tu explicación.

Por cierto, eso que me has comentado me hizo surgir una duda... ¿Crees que en algunos "casos excepcionales" como en el caso de Antoni Gaudí sea válido (o mejor dicho, esté justificado) que el parámetro "nationality" aparezca en el infobox?... Te pregunto por casos como ese específicamente porque si observas el lead en el artículo de Gaudí notarás que no se le describe como "Spanish", sino como "Catalan from Spain", una frase que quizá pueda parecer un poco confusa o engañosa principalmente para alguien que no esté familiarizado con España y su historia, porque quizá podría dar a entender que Cataluña es un país independiente cuando en realidad no lo es... Lo que quiero decir es: ¿En casos cómo ese crees que sí estaría justificado que el parámetro "nationality" esté en el infobox?

Te agradecería mucho si pudieras responderme. De antemano gracias. Aziyade Gil (talk) 01:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Bueno... ¡en realidad ya lo hice en el artículo de Gaudí! :-)

El usuario Crystallizedcarbon (que también es español) me ayudó con respecto a eso: originalmente el artículo de Gaudí se refería a él como "Catalan architect" sin hacer referencia a su país de ciudadanía, y el usuario Crystallizedcarbon dió argumentos al usuario que se oponía a que el término "Spain" apareciera en el lead y finalmente, después de una discusión que tomó mucho tiempo y esfuerzo, Crystallizedcarbon logró que finalmente el lead fuera cambiado a "Catalan from Spain" Aziyade Gil (talk) 02:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Ah por cierto, quería comentarte que soy de Cuba. Aunque tengo doble nacionalidad: cubana y española (la nacionalidad española la heredé de mi padre) pero siempre he vivido en Cuba. Por cierto, tengo una pregunta... ¿eres español?... Lo pregunto porque he notado que editas con mucha frecuencia artículos vinculados a temas de España Aziyade Gil (talk) 23:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Hola Asqueladd, quisiera pedirte por favor ayuda para traducir dos oraciones: Sucede que estoy preparando un artículo para ser creado en English Wikipedia acerca de una locutora de radio y actriz cubana llamada "Massiel Dueñas". La mayor parte del contenido que he llevado al inglés con el traductor de Google me ha quedado bastante bien; pero esas dos oraciones a las que me refiero, al ser traducidas no quedan bien.

Por eso te pido tu ayuda: quisiera pedirte (si no es mucha molestia) si en base a tus conocimientos de idioma inglés pudieras traducirme esas dos oraciones de modo que queden bien y después enviarme la traducción en un mensaje de respuesta. Te prometo que después de esto no te volveré a molestar para ninguna traducción. Las oraciones son las siguientes:

"Hasta la edad de un año, Dueñas vivió con sus padres en el municipio habanero de Miramar."

"Dueñas comenzó su carrera en la radiodifusión en el año 2004 y luego pasó a la televisión como actriz."

Una vez más, perdóname las molestias y muchas gracias. Aziyade Gil (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Muchas gracias de un modo u otro, Asqueladd. En realidad lo que habitualmente yo hago cuando tengo alguna duda con respecto a alguna frase hecha con traductor de Google es que le pido ayuda a una traductora profesional que yo conozco y que trabaja conmigo. Yo trabajo en el Instituto Cubano de Radio y Televisión, específicamente en el canal Cubavision International; y ella es traductora de inglés en ese canal, pero ahora ella está de vacaciones durante algunos días. Aziyade Gil (talk) 23:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Stop tag-bombing articles
You know, you are allowed to just make articles better. Most of the things you are tagging at History of Europe can just be fixed by yourself without tagging them. Things like wording changes and phrasing can take no more time to correct than adding a tag does. If you don't agree with what is written there, just fix it yourself. If you have the time and energy to type the letters in a tag, you have the time and energy to type the letters that would fix the problem you are tagging. -- Jayron 32 13:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Look, since you insist on tagging the article instead, here's a compromise. Why don't you type the replacement text you would like to see here on your talk page, and I'll copy it over for you.  I'm not sure why that is easier than just fixing the text yourself, but as you are reticent to add your own, better text to the article, I'll gladly do it for you.  You obviously have the correct words in your mind for what should be written there.  Just type them here on your talk page and I'll put them in.  Win-win situation: the article gets better, and you get to continue not being the one to make it better, which you seem to, for reasons I can't fathom, not want to actually put the words that improve the article into it directly.  -- Jayron 32 13:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I will try. You (and I) are trying to pull the very ambitious attempt of summarizing the history of Europe in a nutshell, I guess trying to step away from overly stretched narratives and nailing a solid big picture of affairs without blind spots. Really, mate, we should be careful with generalizations, because if we are not careful, we end up inadvertently applying generalizations, big words and framings (and undue weight to processes) associated to national histories and visions of history. Cheers.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with you there. I was trying to expand the lead of the article, which was previously a single short paragraph, into something more in line with the length of the article and the breadth of the topic.  I invite and encourage you and anyone else to improve my recent changes.  My only objection is that tagging is not an improvement, especially when the tags are so easily fixed.  I know I'm not a perfect writer, and your wording changes represent a big improvement over mine.  Please continue to improve the writing as you see fit, but please don't just slap "dubious" on something where the phrasing is either facile, improper, or misleading.  If you find it so, you obviously have an idea what it should say, so just do so.  I find it far less insulting if you just go fix my text and make it actually better than slapping a tag on it and wandering away leaving others to read your mind and try to figure out what you find wrong.  But again, thank you for your fixes, and I appreciate all the work you have done so far.  -- Jayron 32 14:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Chat
Dear Asqueladd is it OK if I chat with you? Iñ&#38;ßùèýàà (talk) 18:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Not interested in a chat.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

I have a question. Iñ&#38;ßùèýàà (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. Not guaranteeing an answer. Very limited expectations about this interchange...--Asqueladd (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Andalusia article, spelling of Córdoba in English
Hello, you undid an edit I made to the article Andalusia with the following edit summary: "This is one valid, apparently, as the title suggests.". I am unsure what that's supposed to mean and which title you are referring to. If you mean the title of the article Córdoba, you'll notice that it's written with an acute accent. Could you please clarify your edit summary and the reasons for reverting the edit? Thank you. Schweinchen (talk) 22:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

If you meant that Cordoba is also a valid spelling, albeit less common than Cordova – and there are sources that support that statement –, then I agree with your reversion. Schweinchen (talk) 22:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I've replied to your message in my talk page. Schweinchen (talk) 20:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Goya ceremonies
Hey, just fyi, the Award category template is supposed to be in the same table cell as the winner and nominees. — HTGS (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, Thanks, although I am not sure I fully understand. Could you provide me with an example of the template used correctly (that would be far easier and straightforward than an elaborate explanation)? Regards--Asqueladd (talk) 21:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Just click that link to Template:Award category and you’ll see an example (plus explanation). You can click to edit source code if that’s easier too. Basically you want the whole award and its title in the same cell (box); so no dividers between cells vertically if you’re editing source. I think if you’re editing visually you might be able to just merge the cells… but I could be wrong. If you want to wait a couple hours I’ll get to a computer and just make the edit on the 33rd goyas and show you. — HTGS (talk) 21:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you mean this short of edit? If so, gotcha, I will try to apply it to the empty vessel of 37th Goya Awards.--Asqueladd (talk) 21:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Exactly! — HTGS (talk) 22:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * For reference, the 36th Goya Awards is correct, but the 35th Goya Awards is wrong. It's an accessibility thing, so that the table can be read easily by blind users. I also like that it matches the infobox visually. — HTGS (talk) 23:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I think the entire series is now fixed. Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Excellent! I’ve seen many of your changes, and it’s so satisfying to see you update tables as well as films and links that you’d already been working on. — HTGS (talk) 18:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Wow, thanks! I am planning on creating some more. :) Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 20:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Smiley TV serie
Dear @Asqueladd. Thank you for creating Smiley (TV series). I tried to help adding two actors on the cast : Cedrick Mugisha (as Ibra) and María Isabel Díaz Lago (as Yessenia). Nevertheless, you reverted it. Did I do something wrong? Saludos. Cahtls (talk) 10:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Asqueladd. Thank you for your work on 2nd Carmen Awards. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   23:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Asqueladd, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AAsqueladd added] the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:58, 25 December 2022 (UTC)