User talk:Assawyer/Archive2

Craig Benson Pic
Is this picture able to go on Wikipedia?(if it is, I call uploading it!) Icelandic Hurricane #12 00:56, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

anon edits
An anon who has done some odd but not necessarily wrong edits on a number of state pages has put in a ton of stuff on the NH page, down in the trivia section. I think at least some of it is duplication and/or stuff you had removed, but I got a bit lost. It's worth checking. - DavidWBrooks 01:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Abu Bakker Qassim & Camp Tango
I don't know if you left it on your watchlist, but I asked about Camp Tango on Talk:Abu Bakker Qassim. Cheers! -- Geo Swan 01:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

his excellency
No, no, no, my friend! "His excellency" is a courtesy title used in personal correspondence (as I noted on the talk page when some anon kept shoving it in) ... it's not the governor's official title. - DavidWBrooks 17:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, Ill be darned - in the constitution! It still is used so rarely that it looks idiotic in the article and, I would submit, should not be placed where you did. Perhaps a note under trivia, but nothing more ... - DavidWBrooks 10:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I think the Constitution is much more important than your feelings about "how it looks," but that's just my opinion. --Assawyer 14:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

UDV case
could you weigh in on the conversation here? i have no strong feelings either way. . . -- He ah?  19:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases
I have recently begun reviving the Supreme Court case project since the founder is inactive. You're welcome to drop on by and help us out if you are still interested. There's also a discussion going at the project's talk page. Enjoy your Memorial Day! --Kchase02 (T) 06:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Supreme Court cases
Please don't post articles that are in such an unfinished state as Garcetti v. Ceballos, which doesn't even have a single complete sentence; start a user subpage if you want to play with a rough draft first. Postdlf 02:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * My apologies, Postdlf. I did that per a msg RidG left on my talk page. I should have used a maintenance tag. Kchase02 (T) 03:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm already substantially into a draft for that case, btw, so unless you're willing to put the time into it, start with another decision. Postdlf 02:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Epping, New Hampshire
I seen that you had a chance to contribute to the new infobox with the parameters that you requested. You may want to further comment at Template_talk:Infobox_City. There was/is a disagreement for the need. I think it looks fine at Epping, NH. It may not look nice and pretty for all cities, but my point was that it was/is completely optional.

Some of us have proposed to standardize most of the city templates into one standardized template. We managed to merge the Template:Infobox U.S. City into Template:Infobox city. The template Template:Infobox Town NH will probably get folded in as well. Harpchad is the main person working on this. Epping, NH would make the perfect example of why to switch to the standard. When the time comes, I am sure that your help would be appreciated.&mdash;MJCdetroit 17:05, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * It looks as if people do not want separate fields for city council/board members. Are you happy with how the Epping example looks using the leader_title and leader_name fields with a series of  's ? &mdash;MJCdetroit 01:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
I just wanted to say thank you for putting the rest of the justices into the SCOTUSCase3 template. It saved me a lot of time :). --MZMcBride 01:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No prob, glad to help.--Assawyer 04:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Supreme Court case PCA
I suspect you may have missed it, but we did quite a bit of work already on Clinton v. City of New York. I'm sure there's more to do, but we'll probably be working on our next collaboration soon enough. Hope you'll join us then.

Re:Switch to SCOTUSCase3
On some cases, I open them up and look at them, but usually only if something looks wrong in the old template. Right now, I've mostly been converting and counting heads to make sure that the correct number of people are listed somewhere in the "Case opinions" section. The fact-check idea sounds good. --MZMcBride 21:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd appreciate it if you'd look at United States v. Booker. It seems two cases were combined, and I'm not sure how to proceed. It may require new parameters in the template, but perhaps not. Respond with any comments you have, please. --MZMcBride 02:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:NHroute28BYP.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:NHroute28BYP.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rory096 23:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

SCOTUSCase
Do you need help? --MZMcBride 18:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, little errors can cause huge issues, I've screwed up these things before. I'm going to revert your edits and then add Litigants2, etc. --MZMcBride 18:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks a bunch! It turned into one big cluster. --Assawyer 18:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Related: From the TFD, I indend to close it, but I'm not sure how to proceed. Replacing Template:SCOTUSRecentCase with Template:SCOTUSCase3 (actually bypassing the redirect and replacing with Template:SCOTUSCase ) screwed things up, so I can't process it with my bot (orhpan it and delete or redirect it). Check this:  and drop me a note about what should I do. Can you orphan it manually? -- Drini 19:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Infobox template question
Hey, any reason why Template:SCOTUS-case can't have the common need version of the new SCOTUS infobox template?--Kchase02 T 08:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I just did it that way so all of the fields would be accessable. I have no problem if it is condensed.  A hidden note could be added which explains how editors can get additional fields. If you want to change it go ahead, otherwise I'll take care of it.  --Assawyer 16:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. I'm having trouble with the ref citations from that template though. They seem to be deprecated, as you can see at UDV. The links work bottom-up but not top-down. I'm converting the template to cite.php unless you know a better way of doing it.

Wikimania in Cambridge next month
Are you going? - DavidWBrooks 12:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. It depends on my work schedule.  Looks interesting though. --Assawyer 01:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Call or e-mail me either way, if you want - I want to talk to a couple NH wikipedians as part of an advance on the meeting. (dbrooks@nashuatelegraph.com, 603-594-5831) - DavidWBrooks 19:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

supreme court
The article seems fine to me; I did a couple of punctuation tweaks, but that's about it. Let me know if you're going to wikimania, by the way - I'll be writing an advance article and need a NH voice! - DavidWBrooks 01:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Town NH
Hi, Assawyer,

I asked about which Infobox to be using for all the towns in NH and didn't get any response. Since most of the previous discussions I read seemed to indicate a merging of the various Infobox City templates, I thought it best to go with the generic one.

Just because I'm curious, what are your objections to using Infobox City?

If I have to, I don't mind going back and redoing with Town NH, but I would think using a template consistent with other towns, cities, and states would be preferable.

Thanks! --SatyrTN
 * I must have missed your previous inquiry. The main problem with the Infobox City is that in being universial, the editors of the Template do not allow for the various differences among the municipalities in the country/world.  Particularly, because New England town/city governments are quite different from the rest of the country the Infobox City does not allow for these variations among towns and cities.  Also, the editors have been resistant to making the appropriate changes.  Shortly, I will be switching Template:Infobox Town NH/test to Template:Infobox Town NH.  If you would like to help out with this that would be great.  Let me know if my explination is lacking. --Assawyer 19:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * All the towns I've inserted Infoboxes into have had Boards of Selectmen. Since there's usually more than one member, I simply add them with   s in between and that seems to work.  If that's the sticking point, and since there's a work-around, can we simply use the standard? -- SatyrTN 20:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Well that's not the only reason. Not all towns have a board of selectmen form of government, some have SB2 and town council. The Infobox City just isn't set up for New England towns.  Mass also has their own for this reason.  Until Infobox City is trully universal, it doesn't make sense to switch over.--Assawyer 02:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * What is SB2? And is a town council usually presided over by a chair, so the same system could be used as I've done with the Board of Selectmen?  Also, see: this discussion. -- SatyrTN 14:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Being involved with Project Massachusetts, I'd also like to emphasize that Infobox City just doesn't work with New England towns. Towns in New England have unique governments, which vary from state to state, but which share the same dissimilarities with the rest of the world. I don't think that there's anything wrong with having several different templates. --AaronS 12:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Deleting SCOTUS templates
Someone has asked that you clarify your vote here. Thanks. --MZMcBride 00:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Nice Map!
Hey - I love the map you've put on the New Durham page! Do you have blank ones for the different counties? I'd love to use those instead of the simple state map I have. Thanks! -- SatyrTN 21:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I have done maps for Rockingham and Strafford Counties. I plan on doing all the towns and cities by county. I am using Adobe Illustrator to make PNG images from Created from Boundary/Border Outline Files (SVG files) that I got from the Libre Map Project.  If you have a particular county you would like me to do next I'll bust some out for you.--Assawyer 22:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The towns I've done so far are in Carroll, Belknap, and Grafton. If you got me PNG files for those, I'll be able to use Photoshop to gett all the towns fixed.  Thanks! -- SatyrTN 22:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I have uploaded the Carroll County maps. I will do Belknap and Grafton (respectively) after dinner.  You will find the maps in the Commons at Category:Maps_of_New_Hampshire.  All you have to do is use the file name as it was in Wikipedia and it will link automatically.--Assawyer 23:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow - these are looking great! I was under the impression you'd upload the county map and I'd have to make each town, but you churned them all out - that's great!
 * I've updated all the towns that I've done infoboxes for in Belknap - with the exception of Tilton, which I somehow missed doing an infobox for. It's now on my list.  I've also updated all the towns I've done infoboxes for in Carroll and Grafton.  Let me know when you get Merrimack done and I'll finish up those, then hit the rest of the maps when I come to them.
 * Thanks so much for all this work - they look fantastic!!! --SatyrTN 13:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Grafton-Bristol-NH.png is missing.
 * Also, it probably doesn't matter enough to worry about, but I noticed Image:Carroll-Ossipee.png isn't Image:Carroll-Ossipee-NH.png. If you change it (and again, it doesn't matter), let me know and/or change Ossipee, NH.
 * Thanks again for all your hard work! --SatyrTN 15:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that the maps are working out GREAT! --SatyrTN 15:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:NH_AG_Kelly_Ayotte.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NH_AG_Kelly_Ayotte.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Infobox City / Concord
When you get a chance, would you take a look at Concord? The Infobox seems to be doing something to put "(city proper))" under the map in the "Coordinates" section. a) I don't think "city proper" is needed, and b) the coding for the link is wrong - it includes the opening parenthesis.  What do you think? SatyrTN
 * I fixed it. . I removed the "latitude" and "longitude" fields and removed "City proper" from "population total." Also, the maps don't have to be 150 px.  I think they look better at max resolution. --Assawyer 19:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weird - so putting "city limits" in the population made it show up on the coordinates? -- SatyrTN
 * I guess.... **shrugs**--Assawyer 20:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Final state highway naming conventions debate
Assawyer, your participation is welcome in the State route naming conventions poll. Please give your input as to the process by 23:59 UTC on August 8.

Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  22:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Several images listed for deletion
Several images or media files that you uploaded or altered, Image:NHroute101.png, Image:NHroute101A.png, Image:NHroute114.png, Image:NHroute12.png, Image:NHroute123.png, Image:NHroute124.png, Image:NHroute125.png, Image:NHroute13.png, Image:NHroute137.png, Image:NHroute1A.png, Image:NHroute1B.png, Image:NHroute25.png, Image:NHroute26.png, Image:NHroute27.png, Image:NHroute28.png, Image:NHroute31.png, Image:NHroute3A.png, Image:NHroute9.png, and Image:NHroute97.png, have been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the titles of the images to find the associated entries), if you are interested in them not being deleted. Thank you. Wwagner 09:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about the big flood here, but they were all listed in Category:Redundant media. They've all been superseded by the SVG versions. &mdash; Wwagner 09:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Project New Hampshire
Hi, Assawyer, When you update a New Hampshire town or city with the new Infobox, would you mind updating the project page? It'll help anyone else adding them to know what's been done - and helps know how much we have left to go :)

Thanks! -- SatyrTN 21:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every biography article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! plange 05:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:US202.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:US202.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  T M F T - C 00:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Biography Newsletter September 2006
The September 2006 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. plange 00:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I saw that you were also in the New Hampshire Wikiproject, so I was wondering if you could use any help with anything. I'm fairly focused on state elections, and i'm looking to branch out and get a bit more social on here.  P eople Powered 13:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:NHemblem.jpg, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 12:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:ManchesterSeal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ManchesterSeal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:USRD Newsletter Issue 1

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.  V 6 0  VTalk · VDemolitions 20:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies
Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of unassessed articles tagged with. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 20:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 2

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.  T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Biography March 2007 Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 22:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

UNH Presidents
I've removed a link on this template - you may wish to check this Rjm at sleepers 16:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Active user verification
Hello,. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks.  V 6 0  VTalk · VDemolitions 20:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

U.S. Roads Inactivity notification
You have been declared an inactive user and your name will be removed from the newsletter distribution and the projects you were a member of. '''If this is in error, please contact me on my talk page. Do not restore your name to the list. Regards, Rschen7754''' (talk - contribs) 20:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007
The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you BetacommandBot 18:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gene G. Chandler.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gene G. Chandler.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 07:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
 WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive! WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.

Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award. There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!

This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards,  Psych less Type words! .

Afroyim v. Rusk
I note that you added a note to the talk page for Afroyim v. Rusk, classifying the article as "Start" class. What would you suggest should be done to the article at this point to improve it? Richwales 00:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Jacobson v. United States
Saw your cleanup work on the talk page. Did you mean to actually promote it to GA? It's still on the nominations page. If not, just give it a B until then. Daniel Case 21:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Joel Pineiro activated from DL
Hi ... I reverted your edit at Template:Boston Red Sox roster. The roster pages at mlb.com aren't always up to date. Pineiro's activation from the DL has been reported in several locations, including the mlb.com transaction page. Thanks for your efforts at keeping the roster accurate. --Sanfranman59 21:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:NH AG Kelly Ayotte.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NH AG Kelly Ayotte.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 13:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NH Executive Council Chambers.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NH Executive Council Chambers.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 13:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NHJudicialSeal.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NHJudicialSeal.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~  Wi ki  her mit  02:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC).

Template:SCOTUSCase3/Test
A you created, Template:SCOTUSCase3/Test,  been marked for deletion as  deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the  tag from the template. If you feel the deletion appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 19:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UNH Seal Blue.png
Thanks for uploading Image:UNH Seal Blue.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Questioning minor 1st paragraph edits?
Re: John Roberts, John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sandra Day O'Connor This is a small matter. I don't understand the reasons for Sjrplscjnky's recent minor edits of articles about each of the Justices of the Supreme Court. After some time, there has been no response to inquiries posted on this editor's talk page nor has there been feedback from similar postings on the talk pages of each of the nine articles about a sitting Justice and the one about retired Justice O'Connor. Rather than simply reverting this "improvement," I thought it best to solicit comment from others who might be interested. I found your name amongst others at Talk:Supreme Court of the United States.

I'm persuaded that Sjrplscjnky's strategy of introducing academic honors in the first paragraph is unhelpful in this narrow set of articles -- that is, in Wikipedia articles about Justices of the Supreme Court. I think my reasoning might well extend as well to others on the Federal bench. In each instance, I would question adding this information only in the first paragraph -- not elsewhere in the article.

In support of my view that this edit should be reverted, please consider re-visiting articles written about the following pairs of jurists.
 * A1. Benjamin Cardozo
 * A2. Learned Hand
 * B1. John Marshall Harlan
 * B2. John Marshall Harlan II

The question becomes: Would the current version of the Wikipedia article about any one of them -- or either pair -- be improved by academic credentials in the introductory paragraph? I think not.

Perhaps it helps to repeat a wry argument Kathleen Sullivan of Stanford Law makes when she suggests that some on the Harvard Law faculty do wonder how Antonin Scalia avoided learning what others have managed to grasp about the processes of judging? I would hope this anecdote gently illustrates the point.

Less humorous, but an even stronger argument is the one Clarence Thomas makes when he mentions wanting to return his law degree to Yale.

As you can see, I'm questioning relatively trivial edit; but I hope you agree that this otherwise plausible "improvement" should be removed from introductory paragraphs of ten articles. If not, why not?

Would you care to offer a comment or observation? --Ooperhoofd (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HudsonSeal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HudsonSeal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NHemblem.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NHemblem.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WSAK-FM.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WSAK-FM.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheNewHampshire.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheNewHampshire.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)