User talk:Assetintegritymark

File source problem with File:Swiss cheese.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Swiss cheese.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:58, 26 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:58, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Process safety swiss cheese.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Process safety swiss cheese.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Getting started in model railways moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Getting started in model railways, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 17:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia is probably not the place for "Getting started in model railways"
Hello Assetintegritymark. Thank you for wanting to contribute to Wikipedia. Unfortunately however I believe your page at Draft:Getting started in model railways is not the kind of thing Wikipedia contains. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia--not a blog and not a how-to guide. One of those links suggests our sister project Wikibooks may welcome such content. —teb728 t c 17:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Moved content to wikibooks
Got the messages re citattions etc and content type. I have moved the content to wikibooks. Can you delete this wikipedia page ? Assetintegritymark (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 19:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)