User talk:Assiaksgian1

Welcome
Hello, Assiaksgian1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Content requires sources
I keep removing the unsourced claims of awards because content particularly content about living persons requires reliably published sources. The fact that other articles have not yet been brought up to appropriate levels of sources is NOT a reason for having inappropriate content in yet another article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

But why do you see the resources as unreliable?I watched for example the award shows and if you want i can post them here, so it is reliable.. further every indian news page posts about it

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia provides a plot SUMMARY not a recreation of every plot twist. The existing summary already exceeds the recommended length. Do not add plot details without first removing or condensing less important content. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It doesnt matter how long the story is, any story can be summarized in a single sentence.
 * As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia and its readers to not need every detail. A summary of 500-700 words is more than enough to capture what is worthy of noting about the plot.
 * If you want to actually improve the article, you should focus on finding third party reliable sources that discuss important things about the show other than its plot and build the article that way. If you are merely interested in regurgitating every plot twist, you are better off building your own fan page where you are perfectly free to build your fansite with whatever content you want. But at Wikipedia you will need to focus on building encyclopedic content.
 * See our guidance on writing about fiction. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  17:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)