User talk:Associated Print

July 2019
Hello, I'm TheGoodAndHolyLord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Richard Tice without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Let's Talk! 23:43, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm JudeccaXIII. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Richard Tice have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. JudeccaXIII (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Tice. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Tice, you may be blocked from editing. JudeccaXIII (talk) 00:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ST47 (talk) 06:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)