User talk:Astavekra

A tag has been placed on your sandbox, User:Astavekra/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages. Although you may start a draft about your company, user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. VViking Talk Edits 06:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. You had no references, and no indication of why this site meets our notability criteria, especially as it is less than six months old
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: has rapidly grown since then... it may be used as a great platform to connect with like minded people... students can become expert and can show their expertise in their area of interest... Benefits of expert... Recruiters are constantly searching for users who suit there company and are fit for the jobs posted by them on our website. The better profile you have the better chances of you getting placed in your dream job... believed to entertain 15,000+ monthly... A remarkable social media reach... has marked its reach to 94 countries... However various investors have shown interest
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

December 2014
Your recent edit to List of question-and-answer websites appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 23:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)