User talk:Asterion/Archive 10

Antarcticwik
Thanks for your input, I agree with what you said. I haven't heard that song however. ;-) Cheers, Khoikhoi 02:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Bienvenido
Hola Asterion. Acabo de leer el libro de Tahir Shah. Fantastico. -- Szvest 14:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up ®
 * Gracias. Heehehehe. Lo que me ha encantado mucho fueron los detalles y la psycologia de cada personaje que fue differente de los demas! Pienso en contactar a Shah y visitar Dar El Khlifa. Que tal fueron las vacaciones? -- Szvest 14:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Estoy tomando un café noir ahora mismo leendo el articulo del New Statesman! lool! El caballo arabe es una demas! Estoy seguro de que Shah tendria mas de 10 historias cada dia para contar!
 * Fue la temporada de bodas para ti, hehehe! Aunque no creo ni descreo en los jinns puedo dicir que es un buen señal/signo lo de las bodas, creo yo! lol! -- Szvest 15:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Malvinas
I disagree. First off, ISO is not designating a name, it is letting you know that that entity has an ISO code of FK (it has no authority to designate a name). Secondly, ISO or not, it really is not referred to as such in English. We do not have to disambiguate if it's not going to be used (and it really won't be—no one will ever look up the Falkland Islands as Malvinas). I note you changed it from I to M, though, which is at least consistent with the ISO use (not designation, because, as I said, the ISO does not designate country names). └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 00:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Apologies, apparently it does think it can designate names--not that that makes them official. Countries decide their own names.  If the UK does not call them Malvinas, and nobody is going to look them up as Malvinas, then there is still no reason to disambiguate. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 00:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Considering that Malvinas already redirect to that article, I think that having the disambiguation would be unnecessary. Cheers, Asterion talk 00:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Operation Allied Force
I accept that. Good job.UberCryxic 18:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Un criterio para las secciones "See Also"
Estimado Asperion, adjunto la respuesta que he escrito en la página de Khoikhoi respecto este asunto. Según tu criterio, Wikipedia está llena de páginas con POV intrínsecos. Me gustaría conocer un criterio escrito acerca del tratamiento de estas secciones.

"Hello: the "standard criterion" that supports your change (a reference mentioned in the "Intro" section must not appear in "see also" section) is not met by other references in that same page (references that Asterion didn't delete, you guys don't act based on the same principles). Other prominent pages like the "United States" article don't meet this principle (please, take a look at it). Please let me know which is the Wikipedia standard on this point, if there is any, to solve this issue. Regards" 

Saludos

Lquiroga 10:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Hi Asterion, I am very thankful to you for supporting and comments on my succesful RfA. Shyam ( T / C ) 06:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Thank you for the congrats, Asterion. :-) Best regards.-- Hús  ö  nd  19:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Moroccan Spaniard
Vaya caso! -- Szvest 09:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Excerpts from Morocco:
 * In September 1998, opposition parties claimed that Morocco's leader Filipe Congrieve Jerazmenos committed fraud in routine federal elections. Street protests and rallies ended in misery when the US bombardment over Tangier ended all hope of resistance, and subsequently, Jerazmenos was restored to power. -- Szvest  Wiki me up ®  18:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Heheheh, si, muchisimo! -- <font color="SteelBlue">Szvest  <font style="background: orange">Wiki me up ®  18:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your input!
Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider.

In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question.

A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork").

Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. -- SB_Johnny |talk|books 14:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Deletion Review
Hi Asterion,

I would appreciate your comment on the request for undeletion of the following article Spanish Gibraltarians. I feel it was unjustly deleted, partly as a result of my own cock up.

You can find it here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_November_16

Thanks --Burgas00 02:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Hola Asterion, que quieres decir con the new for references? Si es the need for references, ya estaban en el articulo que fue deleted pero se perdieron... Habia 4 o 5 references. Si quieres las pongo...Thanks for your opinion! --Burgas00 20:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Tengo la cabeza echa un lio. Lo acabo de arreglar. La verdad es que no se que hago en wikipedia ahora mismo. Tengo que estar en Heathrow a las 5 de la mañana... Asterion talk 20:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Ojo con wikipedia que es un vicio! A la cama! yo me voy de marchuqui q pa algo es viernes!--Burgas00 20:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Vale hombre, me tomare un par de Guinness a tu salud! Asterion talk 20:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Buenas! Espero que hayas disfrutado de tus vacaciones. He añadido las references que faltaban en el articulo de Spanish Gibraltarians. Echale un vistazo y si estas satisfecho hazme el favor de votar undelete en el tema de undeletion.

Muchas gracias. --Burgas00 18:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hola Asterion. El articulo de Spanish Gibraltarians fue undeleted e injustamente deleted otra vez por no se que razon. Me he quejado aqui... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_December_4#Spanish_Gibraltarians Podrias echarme una mano, una vez mas. Muchas gracias.

--Burgas00 19:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Mistaken revert?
Hey there Asterion, I just stumbled accross this, thought you should know. Seems some good faith vandalism removal was reverted. Cheers. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:39, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the mistake. Thanks a lot for letting me know. Asterion talk 23:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For fixing my talk page. --MichaelMaggs 20:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)