User talk:Astorst

Hi!SLY111 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)SLY111

Given I've seen a KTA membership directory (see 4 August 2008 message), I'm miffed that reference notes aren't provided for Keys's membership. Please do so, or face appropriate edits.SLY111SLY111 (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

obviously you haven't looked very closely then. look again. and once confirmed feel free to cite yours as a source. Astorst (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Given I've seen a KTA membership directory (John deKoven Alsop employed a former girlfriend of mine), I'm miffed that you haven't noted the source of KTA membership. Do so, for the benefit of this entry and the esteemed membership.SLY111 (talk) 04:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)SLY111

What is your source for KTA membership? The W.H.S. and Bones entries state the source for "Notable members".SLY111 (talk) 04:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)SLY111 That would cover many of the entires I could confirm from researching the Moore family; however, several of the other entries might be fabrications, given teh lack of a footnote. And it's be great if you noted the "smokers..." website for the approriate entries. Light up.SLY111 (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)SLY111 Along lines similiar to the below ALERT, the Keys "Notable members" section needs a footnote, much like footnote 2 for the W.H.S. entry; without it, I'll delete said section.SLY111 (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)SLY111

Speedy deletion of Stanley Riveles
A tag has been placed on Stanley Riveles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds 02:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Tap any bluebloods in 2010?SLY111