User talk:AstroChemist/Archives/2014/December

Hi, I need some guidance on starting a dispute resolution
I am a new editor and I wanted to start a dispute resolution on the Cheema article as the [user:Sitush] over the years has removed cited content from the article and reduced it to one line of text. He claimed Raj era sources aren't accepted but I have found articles where he has been an active editor where he has allowed Raj era sources to go unchallenged. With his last arrogant comment directed at me it raised some suspicions, due to the nature of the work I do as a student I find some discrepancies which are disturbing, there is no uniformity to his citation process. I will provide more evidence if you need but I am new to wiki and I am coming to grips with all the policies. To start with please see: also see:  I have also found other sources which proved my initial edits that Cheema is a Jatt tribe, see:, he has been unable to explain why 200 years of Raj era published books are being dismissed as unrealiable, while he has edited other articles were he has not reverted and removed content which relies on Raj era books. It's rather baffling that 200 years or more of published historical books and documents can be dismissed, when sources like the chachnama are accepted in India many of the earlier censuses relied on these books he is removing content of as unreliable. Here is what the article looked like some years ago: granted it was biased and needed work done on it, but slow and gradual removal of content was not the way to go. Firstly, for the record I know the British never used military strategy claims of tribes in their theory of martial races those issues should have been corrected and not deleted. Syanaee (talk) 21:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear AstroChemist I do not agree with the first sentence you have modified in the Astroengineering article. The definition you give rather corresponds to space engineering as-we-know-it, as the ISS for example. Astroengineering refers to space engineering at megascale - at astronomical scale, in fact as suggested by the 'astro' prefix of astroengineering. It is not a form of megascale engineering, as said in the second sentence,astroengineering is megascale engineering. Astroengineering is therefore - to my opinion - not within human urgent capabilities. Instead of ISS, examples would rather include the well-known Dyson spheres, or more generally other structures ( or, as your write machines, devices, systems, materials and processes) build/manufactured at planetary, stellar or even galactic scales. Best TFMNight TheFullMoonNight (talk) 23:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)