User talk:AstroHurricane001/Archive 13

=October 2007=

Redirect

 * → Comet McNaught

What's the purpose of this redirect you created? - Mtmelendez (Talk 15:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: med
Nah, only that 1 is decent enough to be named. Cycl one1  (00:12-18-10-2007)  —Preceding comment was added at 00:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for signing. Really appreciate it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You're WELCOME. That's what I'm here for. And nice page. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi.
Hello AstroHurricane001, I hope I'm not being too forward, but I was just wondering for the meaning of this? I'm just wondering where I claimed to be Paul McCartney? I am not, just a fan. I was infact named after him. I was just wondering the meaning. This message is not meant to be read as "yelling", I am just wondering. Thank you. --JpGrB 15:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I understand now. Yeah, no, I was just named after Paul, first and middle name, but I, as he, go by my middle name.  I'm sorry if I have violated any Wikipedian policies.  JpGrB 23:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Your report at WP:ANI
Per Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites, "Wikipedia should not link to websites set up for the purpose of or substantially devoted to harassing its volunteers. Harassment in this context refers to... outing people without their consent..." Please do not restore your report, or the link contained therein. John254 16:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * To answer your question - yes, Wikipedia administrators (especially those on that page) are well aware that it exists. There isn't much that can be done about it though. It really isn't a good idea to link to it on a high profile page like WP:ANI though - that will give it much wider publicity among those who didn't know it existed (or how to find it) previously. WjBscribe 16:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story
Hi. I'm pleased to be able to tell you that the 'project' has been very productive. I have however run into some trouble. Apparently you can't link project pages to articles very easily(complicated rules). I was wondering if you could help me get an accurate assessment as to weather the article is good enough to publish or not. Thank you. U5K0 19:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)