User talk:AstroHurricane001/Archive 40

=January 2010=

Humboldt current
The Humboldt Current and the South Equatorial Current are both part of a gyre. More specifically, they form part of the boundary current of the South Pacific Gyre. It seems to me, although I am not going to post this on the ref desk as I am not certain it is correct, that the Humboldt Current is warmed in the tropics and becomes the South Equatorial Current. At least, that seems to be suggested by maps of the gyre. Hope that helps.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  14:33, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Good to know that part
Thanks for the reference on artificial trees. That probably means absolutely no separation cost at the equator with the amount of excess heat or with even further improvements in that technology.Julzes (talk) 02:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles in the topic area of climate change are under general sanctions due to continued disruptive editing
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed is on article probation. - 2/0 (cont.) 15:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello AstroHurricane001! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:44, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Tim Bolen -
 * 2) Nneka Elliott -

RfD nomination of Amundsen Ice Plain
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Polargeo (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

New Scientist
If I had been around that afternoon and not Richard Hindmarsh the New Scientist journalist may well have got a quote from me. I have spoken to Richard about his quote and he agrees that the New Scientist article has placed it out of context. It is fairly obvious to me because I work on this area but I understand how many would take the NS article. You were not correctly representing how the NS article presents it either so the wikipedia article was ending up being even more incorrect than the NS article was. Polargeo (talk) 07:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Flash mob
Would be mind elaborating on the Talk:Flash mob discussion on how the International Day of Climate Action meets the flash mob criteria over say a festival or convention? The fact that media advertising was purchased, hotels and accommodations books, staff, and that it took place over a very long extended time in a very organized and 'not-unusual' activities were planned does not suggest this is related to the concept of flash mobs. Mkdw talk 19:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
— Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  04:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)