User talk:Astrocave

Welcome!
Hello, Astrocave, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! satusuro 05:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Nah
No big deal - so often people revert and dont explain, so I am taking note of what is a better way, explaining but not reverting. The whole thing of a balanced encyclopediac article about a location/place/business is that it began sometime/operated - etc - to emphasise something as a current great place can be seen to be a problem... WP:UNDUE and a few others come to mind. Even if youre not actually connected - simply to give a link that provides current info can be misconstrued. Try looking at other market articles from around australia - get a handle on how other locations are written up. cheers satusuro 06:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Per WP:MOS - WP:NOTABILITY - I can think of a few editors who would have one look and put it up for deletion... current famous is not a component of notability unless backed up by WP:RS - very important to look at other articles on similar subjects and how they are developed. satusuro 06:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * If you are a new editor and just getting used to things, try looking at comparable existing things - think, are they actually good encyclopedic articles? deletion/notability - etc - well worth checking it all out - better time spend on learning the ropes in creating content than removing - I think... satusuro 19:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)