User talk:Astrochologist13

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 21:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Spam
Stop spamming your website. Cheers, Second Quantization (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. With regard to your note on Second Quantization's page: yes, according to Wikipedia's policies, that is spam. You'll be blocked if you don't stop. Bishonen &#124; talk 22:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC).

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Astrology with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.  Erebus Morgaine  (Talk) 22:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Astrochologist, I will restate what I said elsewhere in case you haven't been able to find it. You didn't identify a real concrete need to include the website on a specific article. You just copy-pasted it into the talk page of numerous articles and said it was relevant after being reverted. The website is self-published and contains opinion, and not considered reliable on wikipedia. See our guidelines which may help clarify things. It is only when you can identify an actual need that it should be included. This means you have to put forward an argument based on policy for why. On adding external links, see the external links guideline, particularly point 11. Second Quantization (talk) 22:33, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * A further note. If the name of your account is that of an organisation (its the same as the website) you should consider a rename. Accounts can not be named after organisations (which would implicitly be shared accounts), and must be unique to an individual. See here about renames. If this is not the case, disregard this message, Second Quantization (talk) 22:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)