User talk:AstronomerPHD

Self-published
As far as I can determine, your book is self-published - if it is not, can you supply the name of the publishing house? --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, according to amazon.com your book is listed as having a 2005 publication date. I understand this was changed to 2002 in a reference.  Could you supply a source supporting the earlier publication date?99.255.10.41 (talk) 11:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Please read this
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Your username
It's a bit puzzling - are you claiming to be an astronomer with a PhD? Dougweller (talk) 11:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

It is you that are implying the issue. If it does not meet up with regulations will you please present a case for it be changed. It is a user name. I am author and not a computer programmer and do not intend trying to learn the ropes here, I am simply getting the page right and doing what is fair. I will proceed with caution and see that the said page follows all requirements. I am getting the feeling the deletion group involved so far with my work has a hidden agenda and I will need to follow up on any false information or malicious unverified deletions of important text is followed up and questioned as you question me, but with media that will be here on this site of the 15th September. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AstronomerPHD (talk • contribs)
 * Actually it's your username that does the implying. If you don't want to answer, that's your right. There's no hidden agenda, just a desire to make sure articles follow our guidelines and policies. I've given you a menu that should help you understand them. You also need to read WP:AGF and WP:NPA so that you don't inadvertently fall foul of those, something you are close to doing with your comments about hidden agendas and malicious deletions. Please learn to sign your name -- under the window where you edit you will see instructions about how to do this. It's just ~ Dougweller (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I will need to follow up on any false information or malicious unverified deletions of important text Something you need to be aware of, that sounds like it's edging towards a legal threat. Wikipedia as a matter of course blocks any accounts that make legal threats without question. --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

AFD
please copy and paster the code there for Not Delete and add your own personal reason in this final debate.

Something you need to understand about the AFD (Articles for Deletion process), it is not a vote, if you get twenty people to vote 'Not delete' and three people argue that it should be deleted because it lacks reliable sources, it will be deleted because of the strength of the argument and the fact that it does not have reliable sources. The *only* way the article can be saved if multiple reliable sources are found and added to the article - for the purposes of notability, anything you wrote yourself is out. --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

From the Author Wayne Herschel I am struggling with this code thing here and obviously selected an offensive user name... I dont know how to change it... i dont know where to write to moderators etc...

I have the rewritten code waiting for the upload with all references as an author i know this is legitimate but something is not working in the reference codes either as well as a conflict claim.... I have written to a few Wikipedia top people simply to ask for help to stop the deletions of fair material and stop the false material loading. Please can someone who understands my pledge please assist with a correct page upload and I will send the rewritten page.

thrbooks@gmail.com

I desperately tried to do this but i am not a programmer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AstronomerPHD (talk • contribs)

And please sign your posts with ~. Darrenhusted (talk) 15:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * From the Author Wayne Herschel Are you saying you are Wayne Herschel?
 * i dont know where to write to moderators etc... There are no "moderators" on Wikipedia, but you can request a change of username.
 * I have written to a few Wikipedia top people simply to ask for help to stop the deletions of fair material You need to realise that there no hierarchy, we work on the basis on consensus and sourcing, the article in question does not meet the bar for notability, and appealing to "top people" will not save an article which fails the basic criteria.
 *  stop the false material loading If the material is in some way libellous then it will be removed by any editor, but if the "false material" is merely promotional then it will be removed because wikipedia is not an advert.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Confused
I saw this message on facebook "I see the page is now deleted, but it might just be before the correct upload is completed. The Wiki authority contact said they are busy with it. If it is still down by Friday and no contact made with me I guess we can assume my situation is more serious than i think it is."

I think you are still confused on how we work here, if the community decided to delete an article at AFD then no administrator can simply restore it because we work via community consensus - administrators deal with conduct not content. Even as an administrator, if they simply try and recreate the page, it will be deleted. --Cameron Scott (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)