User talk:Astronomyinertia/Archive 1

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Motto of the Day
Hi there, Astronomyinertia! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –p joe f (talk • contribs) 12:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Pottu Amman
I reverted your additions because they are a verbatim copy of DBS jearajs posting and violate wikipedia copyright. Besides DBS writes from a blog and blogs are not reliable sources. Granted Pottu amman is a terrorist, but verbatim adding of information is not allowed,

Proposed deletion of Astronomical Society of Dharmaraja College


The article Astronomical Society of Dharmaraja College has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Astronomical Society of Dharmaraja College – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 20:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Astronomical Society of Dharmaraja College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to include material copied or closely paraphrased from http://www.pdn.ac.lk/news/calender/calender200102.pdf and other sources, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text will need to be deleted. (There is more information at the article's talk page.) While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on new text to replace the problems in the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

In addition, I note that in creating this article you copied content from Students' union without giving credit. This is also a copyright problem, as Wikipedia's contributors do not place their material into public domain but retain the right to attribution. I have repaired this particular issue, but please make sure you do not copy content from other Wikipedia pages without giving credit as described at Copying within Wikipedia.

Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

CCS/SLAS
I noticed, you have added both CCS, SLAS which is not possible. Some may have served in both but CCS as post nominals were used by those who retired from the CCS or left it before the SLAS as those in the CCS had to adapt SLAS after its formation. just a FYI. Further more Educationalist dont fall into the SLAS. Please dont randomly add people like this its very unfair for those who are actual members of it. Cossde (talk) 13:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay Astronomyinertia (talk) 14:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sri Lanka Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences


The article Sri Lanka Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * According to its website, this journal has not published any issues yet. A Google search fails to locate any sources for this journal (other than WP itself and its homepage), either under the current or under any of the former names. Apparently does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Buddhist terrorism
An article that you have been involved in editing, Buddhist terrorism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cossde (talk) 12:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Premakeerthi de Alwis
Dear friend,Could you please see this Talk:Premakeerthi de Alwis and please contribute your suggestion about  his murder case. I am trying to write new issue about Hadson Samarasinghe Where mention on book of ‘’Premakeethini’’by nirmala de alwis. But it is removing. Please tell your opinions.--Wipeouting (talk) 10:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Astronomical Society of Dharmaraja College (ASDRC) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Astronomical Society of Dharmaraja College (ASDRC), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Astronomical Society of Dharmaraja College (ASDRC) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Abductive (reasoning) 01:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Dharmaraja College alumni for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article List of Dharmaraja College alumni, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Dharmaraja College alumni until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Lead section

 * Russia extended its support to WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange by issuing a statement which suggested that Assange should be awarded the Nobel peace prize, in the aftermath of the cables leak.

Hi. Can you explain why you added this to the lead section of the United States diplomatic cables leak article? I notice you've also added this to other articles as well, but why the lead? Viriditas (talk) 22:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I think the lead section should contain a little bit from the reaction from the international community on the leak. Perhaps the most interesting and forceful reaction we yet have seen is this one from Russia. The political gravity of this statement is enormous. It not only suggests the Russian support to the ongoing leak but also portrays the perfectly divided international opinion on the issue. Put aside support from the well known critics of USA like Chavez, Russia extending support to WikiLeaks is crucial. So does it not deserve the lead section? By the way I added it to WikiLeaks and United States diplomatic cables leak pages only. Astronomyinertia (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Re Julian Assange article
I have reverted the edit you made, adding the names of the alleged sexual assault victims. This has been discussed extensively on the talk page, and a clear consensus had been reached not to include them, as a breach of WP:BLP policy. Can I ask that if you want to make controversial changes to this article that you discuss it on the talk page first? There are many differing opinions on this subject, and major changes made without consensus are liable to start an edit war. So far, we've been able to keep the article only semi-protected, and it will obviously be best to stay that way if possible. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Wrongful accusation of vandalism
In this edit you accuse a fellow editor of vandalism. As per WP:VANDAL the edit which you were removing clearly was a good-faith edit and you labeling it vandalism equally clearly inappropriate. I suggest you rescind your comment by posting an apology on the talk page of the article as well as on the talk page of the user whom you wrongfully slandered. __meco (talk) 10:06, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I cannot characterize it as a good faith edit because the user has blanked the entire content on the section "Political and media responses" while adding only the "WikiLeaks Task Force (WTF)" sub section on the Reactions to the United States diplomatic cables leak article. Can't you see that a vast amount of information is missing between the two edits? The consensus was to move the content to the Reactions article, which the user has failed to perform. Moreover, the user has been blocked previously due to similar behaviour. Your unnecessarily aggressive tone surprised me very much. Thanks. Astronomyinertia (talk) 10:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Since you you feel that my note is unwarranted, allow me to quote the first sentence from WP:VANDAL: "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." Are you explicitly asserting that User:Fellytone was deliberately attempting to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia? __meco (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Because of the political sensitivity of the subject, chances exist he might have delibarately attempted to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. The way he has made the edits exhibits a WP:GAME scenario to me. But that's my suspicion and I have no intention in carrying out an investigation, simply because I have no interest in other people's affairs. What I'm conscious of is the content of the articles. The content he had blanked was edited and polished by hundreds of enthusiastic editors over a period of month. He has no right to make it vanish by just one click! That's my whole point! Astronomyinertia (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, my point is that you cannot throw accusations of vandalism at a user based on your hunch that they really are out to deliberately compromise the project with no evidence to substantiate your claim. That is a breach of WP:VANDAL and you are contributing to the general misapplication of the vandal term by so many editors. __meco (talk) 19:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Evidence provided above should be enough to support my claims. Astronomyinertia (talk) 18:35, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * In no way. What your links evidence is an attempt to change the bias of the article in one certain direction. That would fall under the heading content dispute. Again, of you bother to read WP:VANDAL you will learn that the vandal term is to be limited to blatantly destructive editing practices, not edits that attempt to sway the focus of the article in one way or another. Also, the fact that the user has previously been blocked for inappropriate editing practices still does not justify labeling the user a vandal. __meco (talk) 19:05, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Astronomyinertia, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Astronomyinertia/Images. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LTTE leaders at Sirumalai camp.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:LTTE leaders at Sirumalai camp.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The expiration of copyright after 25 claim is wrong, see http://www.nipo.gov.lk/copy.htm

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Denniss (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Khamis Gaddafi
I have some trouble with a recent edit you made to the biography on Khamis Gaddafi. Both sides in the Libyan conflict have used propaganda, and have been manipulative of international media, if not outright lying to it. The phrase "it was proven to be false" in reference to pro-Gaddafi reports seems to trust to one untrustworthy side over the other, and that's something we need to avoid on Wikipedia. Even the article the phrase was sourced to only refers to "a man Libyan state television said was Muammar al-Qaddafi's youngest son". If the source is unsure, then we can't use it to make a definitive claim one way or another. Thanks!--Objectively (talk) 20:48, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Agree. Both sides have manipulated media during the course of fighting. But in this case, even the western media seems to be withdrawing its earlier claim that Khamis was killed. For example, The Telegraph states, Khamis, the commander of the feared and effective 32nd brigade of the Libyan army, had been erroneously reported dead twice in the campaign. No foreign government has disputed these claims either. However if you insist, I'm not against wording the sentence again to a less definitive tone. Astronomyinertia (talk) 07:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Award

 * Thank you:) Astronomyinertia (talk) 10:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Dharmaraja- Kingswood 100th Cricket Match Commemoration Stamp.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dharmaraja- Kingswood 100th Cricket Match Commemoration Stamp.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Dispute notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Sri_lanka". Thank you. --Distributor108 (talk) 01:31, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

MedCab
You've been named as an interested party at Mediation Cabal/Cases/16 September 2011/Sri Lanka. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 18:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For putting up with all of Distributor108's nonsense, particularly on DRN. Keep up the good work!

 obi2canibe talk contr 14:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 
 * Thank you:) Astronomyinertia (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I came to ask you to collaborate with me to clean up an article. you can F yourself now- traitor Distributor108 (talk) 09:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Collaboration
Hey hows it going? Considering the recent situation I have been urged to fix up the History of Sri Lanka articles. I have started rewriting Post conflict history of Sri Lanka and I am thinking if I have time I will work backwards. I would very much like your collaboration on these articles. What do you say?--Blackknight12 (talk) 01:46, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Of course I'll join with you to rewrite these articles. However it's thoroughly disheartening to see people promoting partisan agendas, without trying to make constructive edits or engage in rational discussions on edits they do not agree. Astronomyinertia (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I totally agree with you, but I think its fair to say that if these people continue breaking wiki policy they will sooner or later be blocked from editing, so right now persistence is the key.
 * Thanks, feel free to revise my edits and add or remove anything you feel necessary.--Blackknight12 (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll take your advice. And will look through your edits. Astronomyinertia (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Warning
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sri Lanka, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Distributor108 (talk) 01:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Astrnomyinertia, I am sure you're not worried about this nonsensical warning. Distributor, section 17 of the talk page is you trying to lay down the law and being corrected. Either way, the talk page is not some kind of law you can cite, and there is no vandalism. One more specious warning and you'll find yourself blocked: this is unacceptable. Drmies (talk) 04:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm not concerned about that:) Astronomyinertia (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

RfC notification
Within both of our continues efforts of trying to stabilize the Sri Lankan articles, I think this process will help many editors (especially the political & emotional-driven editors) understand how Wikipedia works when it comes to consensus. It's also important for them to realize that we can't always force our views over the others. I strongly believe that everyone will benefit from the process. Take care and see you around. I just published the request for comment from the open-wide community in history-related topics: Talk:Sri_Lanka    ~ AdvertAdam  on-mobile  06:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've posted my argument there. Astronomyinertia (talk) 06:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, you're mean! How dare you revert the RfC bot, jkjk. Haha, I think you've made a mistake on your edit and reverted me and the bot. Can you please revert yourself and then post your argument again. Actually, I saw my mistake and I did change the suggestion in my last edit to put "civil war" under "post independent..."! Cheers...    ~ AdvertAdam  on-mobile  10:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Haha. Sorry about that. I think I've put things back to normal again.. Astronomyinertia (talk) 14:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Kool ;)    ~ AdvertAdam  on-mobile  20:14, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Reactions to the end of the Sri Lankan Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TRT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of universities in Sri Lanka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Lies Agreed Upon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lies Agreed Upon.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sri Lanka Eye Donation Society
Hello! Your submission of Sri Lanka Eye Donation Society at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 16:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I also put an orphan tag on the page because the only other Wikipedia page that mentions the society is that of Silva. Can you insert a mention of the society in other articles? Yoninah (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for corrupting noticeboard reports and personal attacks under the ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ account. You will not be unblocked until you agree to cease this behaviour. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. .&mdash;Kww(talk) 12:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Admittedly, there's definitely plausibility in your defense&mdash;even to the point were I'm inclined to believe it. You do, in fact, have thousands of edits, and your account was created 10:04, 12 March 2009. The behavior by the proxy account(s) appear to be wayyy over-the-top disruptive, all in a provoking, overly-blatant way that would otherwise obviously point back to you as the culprit. Keep in mind, however, that if you were framed, you definitely made it extremely easy for someone to do so simply by choosing to edit war in the first place. As an extreme analogy, it'd be like getting framed for murder after having repeatedly sent death threats to someone. ;) Regardless, I'm still very much inclined to suggest that the blocking admin reduce his block on this account from indefinite to something more reasonable (i.e., change it to an edit warring block).  Such a get-out-of-jail-free card would only work this one time, however, because if someone's actually eager to get you blocked, you literally would not be able to even remotely edit war for the near future, otherwise you'd be setting yourself up to get blocked again. Therefore, I'd highly suggest that you voluntarily stick to a one-revert rule with any controversial changes. -- slakr  \ talk / 19:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

I won't object if another admin chooses to unblock, but I won't do so. The ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ account was using proxies, so technical evidence can't prove things one way or the other.&mdash;Kww(talk) 20:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * If it is any consolation I have known Astronomyinertia for a while now, I have worked with him and and follow his edits regularly. What he is being accused of here is highly unlike him, nor has he ever provoked, insulted or threatened any other user (to my knowledge). I urge the Admins to go through his contributions and find a link between him and those that are suspected of being him. Astronomyinertia is a proficient and experienced editor, he has won and lost arguments before but has not turned to cheap strategies to win himself one. Which I suspect is what the ones doing the framing wants it look like. The fact that was suddenly created in the midst of another argument (in Lies Agreed Upon), you would have to ask yourself the question Why now and not in any of his previous arguments over the past three years?


 * The only wrong doing here by Astronomyinertia looks to be the edit warring which, as Slakr brings up, was cunningly used against him. However he hasn't been able to defend himself and his actions regarding that, so it does see a little unfair to be blocked for it. Astronomyinertia is a valued member of both Wikipedia and WikiProject Sri Lanka, which I invited him to, and to lose him would not only be loss for Wikipedia, but also a win for those who are working against Wiki. I can assure you Astronomyinertia is not the one who is doing wrong here and I hope you guys (Slakr and Kww) reconsider. Thanks--Blackknight12 (talk) 02:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks guys for the reconsideration. I will definitely stick to 1RR hereafter, for the sake of not getting myself framed again. But I think I have to do a little explanation on why I chose to revert that same edit on the article Battle of Aanandapuram. Editwarring is widespread in the Sri Lanka, Sri Lankan Civil War and related articles, which I've been editing for some time. But note that I never got a warning for editwarring, not even once, prior to this incident. Once I created the Lies Agreed Upon article, all sorts of attempts have been made to remove its contents, without going for an AfD. There had been a lengthy discussion on its talkpage, which I invite you to go through, to analyse whether I my argument was againt Wikipedia policies. I even pointed out to the editor that I had ceased editwarring twice, to concentrate on the discussion. But that didn't resolve the dispute. Then I noticed that that editor is following my contribution history, and adding the tag, in the articles I did editing, such as this one. I also noticed that he has added this wikilink to the articles; Sri Lanka Army, Battle of Puthukkudiyirippu and Battle of Aanandapuram. I did not revert that edit on the first 2 artcles, because there are allegations on these two. But the 3rd addition, I believe, has been completely arbitrary and made just because I was editing that article. That's why I kept reverting that edit, while discussing the issue on the talkpage. Even the editor who made that edit, agrees that it is merely a rumor, not based on any reliable source. I stll believe I was correct to revert that edit, but will opt for other dispute resolution methods, when I come across such situations in the future. Thank you. Astronomyinertia (talk) 04:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

ANI
I have posted on ANI where your user name is involved.HudsonBreeze (talk) 01:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sri Lanka Eye Donation Society
Orlady (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

MOTDs (This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 16:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. When you recently edited Kotikawatta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaduwela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC)