User talk:Astrophobe/Archive ga

Sarah Cooper Good Article review
Hi, an editor has reviewed Sarah Cooper against the Good Article criteria, and placed it on hold. I've responded to most of the comments at Talk:Sarah Cooper/GA1, but would you mind addressing the "Birthdate needs a source" comment? I know that you've spent some time looking at sources about her year of birth. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for bringing that to my attention! I expected that would be a sore spot, for one simple reason: a reliable source (the washington post, I think) once got her year of birth wildly wrong, which has caused all sorts of back and forth on the page. But after some discussion we found that on balance her year of birth is crystal clear, and the consensus on the talk page has been stable for a long time, so it shouldn't be a problem for hitting GA. I will take a crack at that in the next few hours. - Astrophobe  (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I think only one nominator for a Good Article gets a message from Legobot - so see User_talk:BennyOnTheLoose ! Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much, and thanks again for adding me as co-nominator! - Astrophobe  (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * AllegedlyHuman has made a DYK nomination - see nominations for 20 March. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skathi (moon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Skathi (moon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skathi (moon)
The article Skathi (moon) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Skathi (moon) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skathi (moon)
The article Skathi (moon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Skathi (moon) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 08:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Simonie Michael
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Simonie Michael you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Femkemilene -- Femkemilene (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Simonie Michael
The article Simonie Michael you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Simonie Michael for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Femkemilene -- Femkemilene (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Interesting article, thanks for nominating! I hope you bring it to DYK. I saw you also nominated political party for GA, and thought you might be interested in WP:The Core Contest, which is due to start in 20 days. FemkeMilene (talk) 19:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks so much ! If I have a bit of spare time next month I definitely have a few articles in mind that would be a good fit for that competition. Thanks again for the review! - Astrophobe  (talk) 22:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Aha, -  Astrophobe  (talk) 22:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Political party
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Political party you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Goldsztajn -- Goldsztajn (talk) 22:20, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Political party
The article Political party you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Political party for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Political party
The article Political party you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Political party for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)