User talk:Asvpxd/sandbox

Everything in the article is related to the topic, one thing that threw me off however, was the example they added about Spencer Haywood. It had little to no relevancy to the topic due to him being over the age of 19 at the time of the rules placement. The claims are neutral and they don't lean toward ending the rule nor keeping it. If anything this person's viewpoints are underreprensented, as they neglect to tell us how they feel about the topic. All of the links are right and do support the facts they are representing. Most of the facts do come from a reliable source and although most are bias and opposed to the rule the editor of the article stayed neutral. The sources are 10 years old but still withstand validity, because the rule is still in place. When going to the talk page i didn't see any conversing taking place. Rated B class article of mid-importance. It is a part of my project and mine only. Wikipedia keeps it neutral and really does not talk about the controversy surrounding the rule.