User talk:Aszu23

Ways to improve Bahra 1
Hello, Aszu23,

Thank you for creating Bahra 1.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"All content of the article must be sourced by reliable sources. There is some unreferenced information on the lead."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
Thank you for your recent articles, including Bahra 1, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including Bahra 1, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bahra 1
Hello! Your submission of Bahra 1 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Johnbod (talk) 18:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Do this now please - if you initiate a DYK nom it isn't really acceptable to only edit fortnightly. Johnbod (talk) 13:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I corrected and added new sources, sorry for the delay, nominated before pandemic in my country. I will also complete the hook in a moment Aszu23 (talk) 18:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Bahra 1
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Monastery in Ghazali


A tag has been placed on Monastery in Ghazali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://pcma.uw.edu.pl/en/2019/03/19/ghazali-2/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I have speedy deleted the article as a copyright infringement. You must not copy from online sources without marking the copied text as a quotation, and properly attributing it. Even if properly marked, excessive quotations are not acceptable. Wikipedia is very serious about this principle. In academic circles it also counts as plagiarism, as you no doubt know. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the appropriate response, although I did not copy, I made footnotes, and in the second source I cited (Sudan and Nubia 22, 155-166) the information resource was similar and in a similar order, of course you are right that there are too many similarities, I'm very sorry about this mistake, I made the second version as a draft, can I have a request to check if it's ok now? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aszu23/Monastery_in_Ghazali Aszu23 (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monastery in Ghazali has been accepted
 Monastery in Ghazali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Monastery_in_Ghazali help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 17:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Aszu23 (talk) 08:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

re: Asasif Project
I have doubts whether the Polish expedition only approach is best. You may want to ask others at WikiProjet Archeology, but as a layman, I'd rather read about the entire history of a site, not just one (national) dimension). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to say thank you for improving this further. Fascinating topics! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean


The article Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Studia Palmyreńskie


The article Studia Palmyreńskie has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 10:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Studia Palmyreńskie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studia Palmyreńskie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Studia Palmyreńskie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 10:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)