User talk:Atari 667

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! - CobaltBlueTony 14:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * P.S. Check out your user page!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --Madchester 22:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

County Londonderry
I've changed your edit to Ulster to correct the county back to County Londonderry as it's correctly called. The county is called Londonderry and the city Derry. Ben W Bell  talk  17:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Same with your edit to Kilrea, please read WP:IMOS, happy editing.   Keithology   Talk!   14:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Filip Šebo
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Atari 667! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule bebo\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:JORGE.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:JORGE.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigDT 05:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:JorgeII.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:JorgeII.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigDT 05:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Scpxbelenenses.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Scpxbelenenses.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigDT 05:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Holy Goalie
Another editor has added the  template to the article Holy Goalie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Scottish Broadcasting Corporation
An article that you have been involved in editing, Scottish Broadcasting Corporation, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Scottish Broadcasting Corporation. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Walter Smith (footballer)
Your edit to Walter Smith was not welcomed and has been reverted. Further such examples will not be tolerated. Consider this your first warning.

Also, since you've demonstrated a lack of courtesy, several of your good-faith edits have also been reverted. - Dudesleeper / Talk  02:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dean Keenan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dean Keenan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Scotland's Shame
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Scotland's Shame, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. WATP  (talk) • (contribs) 19:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 19:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Micky Mullan
A tag has been placed on Micky Mullan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. dj (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boaby
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Boaby, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or an urban dictionary either

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Davitt cup.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Davitt cup.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:TCH logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TCH logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Pendergast TCH.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pendergast TCH.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 20:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to Nick Griffin
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Jza84 | Talk  16:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scotlands shame
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Scotlands shame, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. – iride  scent  18:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scotland's Shame
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Scotland's Shame, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. – iride  scent  18:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Merchant City described as including a "gay village"
With regard to your recent deletion of sourced material from List of gay villages, do you have a source that contradicts Alan Murphy's description in the Footprint Glasgow Handbook? The description is explicitly clear and your rationale in the edit summary that 'Merchant City' is a historic quarter can be applied to London Soho which is probably considered far more historic but is still described as a "gay village" area. Why do you think that Glasgay! is held there? —Ash (talk) 17:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Source:

A gay village is defined by wikipedia as "...an urban geographic location with generally recognized boundaries where a large number of lesbian, gay, transgender, and bisexual people live." There is absolutely no evidence to suggest this is the case. The misconception of Merchant City is, I believe stemming from the fact that there are three gay clubs within the boundaries. It should be noted that this is somewhat a drop in the ocean considering the size of the district. A far higher number of Italian outlets are in operation in the area, Italian Centre, Italian Kitchen, Bella Vita and Armani but I would not see fit to deem it the Italian quarter. Additionally one could point out a far greater number of bars and facilities frequented by the Irish community. As for the fact that Glasgay! is held there, I fail to see how this is relevent as the Merchant City is also the venue for numerous festivals and events for example, St. Patrick's Day, Merchant City Festival and the German Christmas Market. I feel that this is sufficient evidence to refute labelling Merchant City as a Gay Village but additionally one should also note that it is being promoted by the Glasgow City Marketing Bureau as a Creative Arts Quarter which I feel further emphasises my point that it is not deemed to be a Gay Village, regardless of how much certain parties would wish it to be so. In further support there is absolutely no reference whatsoever to this being held to be true from the City Marketing Bureau. I feel this should be the end of what is a ridiculous claiming stemming from nothing more than wishful thinking.

&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;;

October 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of gay villages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ''You have removed the same content several times. This content is well sourced and since your previous removals has been discussed appropriately on the talk page and re-added by consensus. Continuing to remove this content without discussion and ignoring current consensus constitutes edit-warring.'' Ash (talk) 09:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:CP_Calley.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:CP_Calley.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Joe McElderry on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —  Io Katai  ᵀᵃˡᵏ  04:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sasa juniors


The article Sasa juniors has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Under 14 football teams which play in public parks are not normally considered notable and I don't see anything different about this one which was only active for two years

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Atari 667! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Anton Gallagher -

Proposed deletion of Anton Gallagher


The article Anton Gallagher has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Googled anton gallagher - no sources found. May be out of date - not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mark Dask 12:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TCH logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:TCH logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Repost of Chris Pendergast
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Jellyman (talk) 11:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Govana Libre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Govana Libre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Govana Libre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jellyman (talk) 09:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pearse Park (Cambuslang)


The article Pearse Park (Cambuslang) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No indication or evidence of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  PK T (alk)  23:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)