User talk:Ataxan.az

April 2020
Nither in University of Tabriz nor in Old Azeri language I did not comment on my personal opinion. There was some information that was missing in both of the threats and I completed them. I demand my contribution to reappear in both of the threats, none of the contributions was a personal opinion, the first one was a fact about a university and the other one was again a topic of common acceptance with references. Please provide an email or a sort of contact so that I can explain myself or should I keep writing through here in this media? Both in the case of Tabriz university and Old Azeri language, I can offer evidence about the truth of my edited sections. For example, the establishment date of the University of Tabriz is stated as 1947 but its a politically engineered fact. It was 1946 but because there was a region changed in that decade and the latter one did not "like" the prior one they simply lie, I can even provide pictures and figures which I initially tried to upload to Wikipedia about the university of Tabriz which was established in 1946.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Old Azeri language. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at University of Tabriz, you may be blocked from editing. Wario-Man (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Old Azeri language. Wario-Man (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your edits
DO NOT add unsourced or your very own personal opinion/commentary to WP articles. Read WP:RS, WP:POV, WP:RULES, and WP:HOW. You need reliable sources for your additions and they should be verifiable. That's all. --Wario-Man (talk) 19:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Wow, everybody tells that Wikipedia is not a reliable source of anything and reading it is a waste of time but I never have believed it. I understand it better now. I will never even try to contribute anyway, with the existence of rude editors like you, this system would not be continued anyway.

Instead of appreciating, insight contributions like mine which you probably will not find in any source (they are the result of years and years of personal research and gatherings) you reject them with harassment and rude approach. It sees your narrow perspective and probably "your personal opinion" into the subjects is forcing you to remove my threats and well it called censorship.

Only the fact that you are asking for "references" is identifying that you have not any understanding and/or insight into the matters that I edited. For the first section on Tabriz university, your reference is nothing more than the university website itself. The university publicly lies about itself on its website due to regime changes; the new one did not approve the old one. And basically I'm clarifying this situation, your references are not trustworthy and if you would have knowledge about the topic you would have known but instead, you are censoring the person who deeply understand many aspects of that issue, good job. In the second threat about old Azeri language, the section that I have edited did not EVEN have any references in the first place and basically, due to that, I added its opposite claims you removed them but kept the original one which did not have any references, and now you are asking me to provide references for the claims? They have to provide references in the first place.

If instead of removing you would be asked for references at the time I would have added SEVERAL and even can do that now but now since I don't have the edited sections, and since you have deleted them brutally I, of course, do not want to put additional time and re-write them again, if you send my writings to me, I can edit them and insert "reliable" references and publish them again. If you do not do that, It will be a loss of you and your institution, and with the result of your censorship, the threats will not be having the crystal clear facts instead of the official narrower of the state but since you do have related knowledge and you do not care it doesn't matter to you. Your ignorance is understandable but NEVER acceptable.

Actually you are contributing to the official wrong narrow of an apparat state and with this, you can even ask for a salary from them, good luck doing that if you have decided to ask for additional income from that apparat region that you are helping to separate their engineered history write to me "ata.golparvar@epfl.ch".

And please stop spamming me from here, have anything to tell, properly send an email. That's all!

April 2020
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User talk:Wario-Man, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  11:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  12:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)